Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 3901 - 3920
of 51,588
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2023, 12:24 pm
In Watts v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
However, the Supreme Court of the United States addressed an analogous situation in Bowen v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
" United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
See, e.g., Krohe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Thomas gave us the answer in his opening paragraph in his brutal dissent in Grutter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Groff v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 2:00 am
Groff v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 12:53 am
Interestingly, the Singapore Court of Appeal in BBA v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
The best that you could possibly hope for anyway is to somehow prevail in state court (which ain't gonna happen) and then have that decision summarily reversed by the Supreme Court in a blistering opinion.But as it is, as expected, you lose -- consistently -- long before that, including but not limited to in today's published opinion by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
This exercise has the merit, at the price of some repetition, of highlighting long-standing issues with the Bill. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:13 am
See Chaker v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am
The question arose again in Democratic Republic of the Congo v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 1:25 pm
The contracts also included FAR 52.229-6, Taxes-Foreign Fixed Price Contracts, which states that the contract price shall be increased by the amount of any after-imposed tax the contractor is required to pay. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 11:05 am
Investigative findings are forwarded to state and/or federal law enforcement agencies for appropriate legal action upon a substantiated finding of fraudulent conduct. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:44 am
Buchanan One of the safest bets in recent years was that Republicans would conveniently drop the pretense that they believe in states' rights as soon as their manufactured Supreme Court super-majority handed them their long-sought repeal of Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:55 am
The debates in both countries crystallize a long-standing tension raised by judicial review of legislation: why and when should courts be authorized to invalidate policies enacted by the political branches on grounds of unconstitutionality? [read post]
One of the Stiffest Charges Against Jan. 6 Insurrectionists Hangs on by a Thread in the D.C. Circuit
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
Although the dissenting opinion cites Bond v. [read post]
