Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 11,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2010, 3:08 am
The hearing officer found DeMichele guilty of all but one of seven specifications set out in the charges. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:00 am
For now, rulings like the one in the Gray v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:09 am
” “They will say nothing rather than make the other person uncomfortable,” stated another site. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
Last week’s oral argument in in Trump v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:50 am
Lazar v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
New York State Department [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm
Pediatrics 108: e59-59 Mead PM, Slutsker L, Dietz V, McCaig LF, Bresee JS, Shapiro C, Griffin PM, and Tauxe RV. (1999). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
New York State Depa [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm
” The federal appeals court ruling in the Virginia case is highly symbolic, because that is the state whose long-standing ban on mixed-race marriages was struck down by the Supreme Court forty-seven years ago, in Loving v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:29 pm
The case, Davis v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm
In Rales v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 3:57 am
Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:06 pm
The first and second applicants served approximately one year and nine months in prison before being amnestied, while the third applicant served approximately seven months imprisonment before her sentence was suspended. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:34 am
Rodriguez was sentenced to seven years in prison and Mr. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm
It did so in the case of Seven-Sky v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
” However, employees of a political subdivision of the State are not within the ambit of §80-a of the Civil Service Law which applies only to the suspension or demotion of employees of the State as the employer upon the abolition or reduction of State positions in the non-competitive class. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 8:16 am
The case is State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm
Banks has since stated that advanced publicity is not a requirement but one factor to be considered along with the other seven criteria. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:21 am
Zaremski’s Complaint purports to state seven Counts: quasi-contract claims (Counts II, III, and IV); fraud claim (Count I); third-party beneficiary claim (Count V); fiduciary duty claim (Count VI); and improper removal (Count VII). [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:36 pm
Dukes decision has been cited in several environmental decisions in both federal and state court, in just the first seven months since the case came down. [read post]
