Search for: "State v. So "
Results 3901 - 3920
of 117,850
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
MacNeil contends doing so violates the Supreme Court’s “ordinary remand rule” established in I.N.S. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:05 am
The case, Dada v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his employment". [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
Props., LLC v Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P., 195 AD3d 1502, 1502-1503; Mazzurco v PII Sam, LLC, 153 AD3d 1341, 1342; Desiderio v Geico Gen. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
FAMILY COURT LACKED JURISDICTIONAlthough his kid lived in Guatemala with the child’s mom since birth, when the two come to the United States to visit, the father refused to return the child to the mom.When the dad asked the Queens County Family Court to exercise “emergency jurisdiction,” and filed a custody petition, the court ultimately determined that it “lacked jurisdiction,” and directed that the child be released to the mother so that he could… [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:45 pm
McElrath v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:58 am
Court action, as stated in the report, is key to forcing governments to uphold their promises regarding climate change and does not allow them to escape accountability if they fail to do so. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:41 am
Chada and Bowsher v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:33 am
In Groff v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:58 am
As they note, the current Court has not been particularly restrained when providing relief in other recent administrative law cases, such as United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
See, e.g., Paul v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:08 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am
And Gundy v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
., Inc. v New York State Public Empl. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:56 am
So has neighboring Guinea on the West African coast. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
See Roe v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
