Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 3901 - 3920
of 8,604
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2016, 6:07 am
That’s from Texas Alcoholic Beverage Comm’n v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 5:58 am
State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 6:50 am
Another U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 6:50 am
Another U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
The U.S. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 5:30 am
The U.S. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:01 am
More than four months after the final rule was announced and only two and half months before it was set to go into effect, Nevada and Texas, along with 19 other states, sued the Department of Labor in the Eastern District of Texas to challenge the new overtime rules in Nevada v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:24 pm
That suit was then consolidated with another suit brought by the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 4:18 pm
The case is State of Nevada v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:31 pm
The lawsuits – one filed by a coalition of twenty-one states (State of Nevada et al. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 10:43 am
They are: State of Nevada et al v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:51 am
Update: On November 22, 2016, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction, blocking implementation of the new Rule nationwide, pending futher review. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:51 am
Update: On November 22, 2016, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction, blocking implementation of the new Rule nationwide, pending futher review. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 9:46 am
(The decision is State of Nevada v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:06 am
Department of Labor, by a group of 21 states, and the other, Chamber of Commerce of Plano v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 7:35 am
In Nevada v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:55 am
” State of Nevada v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:33 am
(Although federal judges in the State of Texas are not leaving him much to do!) [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:25 am
Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966); Dusky v. [read post]
