Search for: "BOX v. STATE"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 5,284
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
to pay 23% ongoing royalty for future infringement: Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 1:11 pm
United States, 293 F. 1013, D.D. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:48 am
The Library of Congress, which is the oldest federal cultural institution in the United States, describes the song as America’s “most powerful song. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 2:07 am
That might be somebody at a household telephone or at a public telephone box. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:30 am
The case is called Williams v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 8:43 pm
For this, the SCOV peeks through the lens of United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 2:07 am
That might be somebody at a household telephone or at a public telephone box. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 9:19 am
See also, State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
” The letter states that during the orientation, Elkin and Mulaire were informed that to provide “feedback” about any issues, volunteers should email a “suggestion box” sent to an HHS.gov email address. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Nov. 18, 2008)(Unpublished)Affirming dismissal of termination claim under state lawDC CircuitMontgomery v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:38 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 11:58 am
CONCERNED ABOUT LOUISIANA PLAN TO CUT HOME MEDICAID SERVICES, Pitts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:08 am
Rondre Thomas v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:27 am
Unconvinced, the court stated that nothing in ostensible agency “marks it as forbidden territory under Rule 23. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:35 am
Vogelbach v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:14 am
The decision in Plumhoff v. [read post]
