Search for: "Does 1 - 33"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 6,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
The Order does not provide useful guidance on this. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
" Alappat, 33 F.3d at 1542 n.18 (Fed. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 6:53 pm
In a prior post the two foundational principles (UNGP Principles 1 and 2) were examined (see here). [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
This analysis shows, however, that consumption does not disappear, and that revenue from taxes on tobacco products is rarely used to offset harm caused by that consumption. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
”). [1] See, e.g., Rabozzi v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:32 am
(Sharpe, pp. 1-4.) [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 10:54 pm
It recites: 1. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
A number of other limits on Chevron and Auer deference are discussed in my PTAB is Not an Article III Court articles, Part 1, A Primer on Federal Agency Rule Making, here, Part 2, Aqua Products v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 11:35 am
But the Principle does more than that. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:15 am
App. 1 (2010). [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:06 pm
People under investigation may be prohibited from leaving the country of Chinese nationals (Article 33); foreigners deemed a risk may be denied entry (Article 34) and likely exit pending investigation. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
En Banc ¶1 MADSEN, J. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:00 am
On the contrary, it seems to me that there are reasonably good grounds to expect that both the church building and the scaffolding around it are in a safe condition [33]. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:50 pm
With a Democratic majority and Democratic General Counsel in place at the EEOC, it does not appear that partisan politics obstructed any of the Commission’s litigation goals. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
The Court noted at [§12 -13] that where the SSHD does not have to make the deportation order for a foreign criminal on the ground that such deportation would be in breach of the criminal’s rights under the ECHR [Exception 1 of Section 33 of the UKBA 2007], the SSHD is not prevented from making such an order and in such circumstances the statutory provision that the “deportation of a foreign criminal is conducive to the public good”… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
Cas. at 26.In his opening brief, Donald Trump appeared to preserve this argument, though just barely: He didn’t devote any space to it.[1] His reply brief does even less with it than that, offering only the ambiguous sentence “that section 3 may be enforced only though the congressionally enacted methods of enforcement,” without even arguing that Chief Justice Chase got it right in Griffin’s Case. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
One does not develop a help desk from the bottom up--nor necessarily with a view to enlarging the primacy of human rights holders who tend to bear the consequences of adverse human rights impacts.[12] Instead, it tends to be more efficient to target those collective organs into which positive responsibility for the care and protection of human rights harms bearers authority are vested. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am
The Instructions, it was submitted, are unlawful on the grounds that they violate Article 1 of Protocol 1 (“A1P1”, protection of property) ECHR [2], Article 7 (no punishment without law) and Article 14 (prohibition of discrimination) [3]. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
I therefore conclude that Ali does not support the appellant’s case. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 7:10 pm
Id. at 33-34. [read post]
