Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 41,647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2012, 10:01 am
In contrast, Maine (10-148, Chapter 201, V. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 11:55 am
Who does it apply to? [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 11:03 am
Part 1 Part 2 [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 11:49 pm
As the examining division correctly observed, document D1 also discloses a further application in sports (column 10, lines 62). [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:00 am
Answer #1 You may apply now for Naturalization. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:09 am
Assume you import 100 melons and make four sales: 15 units for $2 each, 10 units for $1.50 each, 40 units for $1 each, and 35 units for $1.50. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
The Family Law Act does not confer upon me a power to order COMSOC to repay to Mr. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:51 am
In the U.S., the most closely analogous cases that come to my mind are Perfect 10 v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 12:34 pm
The Corinthians had hauled one another before Caesar’s courts (1 Cor. 6:1-8) and split into warring factions (1 Cor. 1:10-17). [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:00 am
Answer #1 Contact the USCIS at 1-800-375-5283 or the National Visa Center and explain the situation. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 1:22 pm
Id. at *1. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:17 pm
Document D9, taken as closest prior art, does not disclose the features of the characterising portion. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 12:45 pm
Florida law does not require the classification of a dog as a "dangerous dog" in order to pursue claim or a case for dog bite injuries. [read post]
27 May 2020, 1:49 pm
These claimants alleged violations of Article 10(1) (telecommunications privacy) and Article 5(1) (press freedom) of the Basic Law. [read post]
27 May 2020, 1:49 pm
These claimants alleged violations of Article 10(1) (telecommunications privacy) and Article 5(1) (press freedom) of the Basic Law. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
This is clearly not the case for respectively claims 1 and 10. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
This section states the court may not order maintenance for more than 10 years if the marriage lasted for 30 years or more. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Jane Doe 2, 18-677, and Trump v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:25 am
§ 841(b)(1)(B), while the other had a 10-year mando under § 841(b)(1)(A). [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
The appellant filed document D18 with letter of 10 September 2018, in preparation of the oral proceedings scheduled before the opposition division, and resubmitted it with the statement of grounds of appeal. [read post]
