Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 3921 - 3940 of 7,358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2014, 12:03 pm
The average reader of English would not readily understand that a provision barring states from “abridge[ing] the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” would necessarily require them to permit interracial marriage. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:20 am by SHG
A sweet start to the statement of facts in United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am by Darius Whelan
 DRI had stated that it would not adopt a position of partisanship. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
Its common sense, “English language” approach allows an organization and its directors to both identify and improve upon its current cybersecurity procedures. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1990 case of Rutan v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
On 5 August 2014, judgment was handed down in Hong Kong in the case of Yeung v Google ([2014] HKCFI 1404). [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 1:08 am
 In 1576, English law set the age of consent at 10 years. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:03 am by Darius Whelan
 As far as I can see, the only English case referred to is from 1957. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:05 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The obligation is stated in common sense terms that a layman can understand; and 3. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The mother is a citizen of the United Kingdom and the father is a citizen of the United States. [read post]