Search for: "Ex Parte United States"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 5,135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
Significant factors include the knowledge of the claimant at the relevant time, whether the illegality involved intentional or negligent conduct on the part of the claimant and whether the commission of the illegal act was induced by the defendant. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:46 pm
(Doc. 8, p. 11, ex. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
Press Controls (Patently-O) BPAI: Orita doctrine blocks patent reissue: Ex parte Gotto et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court W D Wisonsin: Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute do not violate appointments clause or take care clause of U.S. constitution: Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:43 am
”There's some comfort, knowing that Camp's decisions must pass justice-muster with the United States Attorney. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:32 am
Indeed it has just won a major case on anti-dumping and subsidy rules against the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:12 am
United States Brief The Solicitor began the brief by arguing that § 282? [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:14 am
Lemley, Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property, 71 U. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:38 am
Related articles What Does a Severely Alienated Child look like in Parental Alienation Syndrome (publiclies.wordpress.com) Fathers’ Rights in the United States (parenting-success.com) Filed under: family law [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
United States, No. 09–6822 (Mar. 2, 2011). [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Another forum seeing an increase in use is the United States Patent & Trademark Office. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:48 pm
In many instances, you may want a competitor or potential competitor’s application for a trademark registration to be refused by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
Taylor Jr. and ex-death row inmate Kirk N. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent Nos. 6,993,669 and 6,408,415 (see inter partes Request No. (3) & ex parte Request No. (31)). [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent Nos. 6,993,669 and 6,408,415 (see inter partes Request No. (3) & ex parte Request No. (31)). [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:05 pm
However, the implications of this court decision, United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
X’s motion: a “regular response” and a “supplemental ex parte response. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
(EFF) Ruminations on IP due diligence (IPKat) More news on the soon-to-launch International IP Strategists Association (IAM) Global – Trade Marks / Brands The future of copyright: WIPO’s vision (1709 Blog) WIPO launches new on-line tool to facilitate brand searches (WIPO) Global – Patents Cost-effective international patenting strategies (inovia’s Foreign Filing Blog) Intellectual Property Today top patent firms list for 2011 released (Maier & Maier) FreePatentsOnline… [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:37 pm
Noncapital United States v Styles Taylor and Keon Thomas, 2011 U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm
The issuance of these decisions terminates the reexamination process, and since the requests were filed on an "ex parte" basis, they cannot be appealed by RJR. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
United States PTO, 2010 U.S. [read post]
