Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 76,232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm
Although the Court may, for good reason, withdraw the liberty to take notes, the default position is that anyone who attends a public hearing is free to take notes. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:30 pm
For angry New York sports fans, who weren't able to watch Game 1 of the National League Championship Series over the weekend, the good news is that Fox and Cablevision are back at the negotiating table to try and settle their dispute over retransmission fees. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:43 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 12:25 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm
In their ruling, the 2nd circuit applied the Costco Wholesale Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:54 am
Such queries came to this Kat's mind when considering the General Court's judgment in Case T-361/11 Hand Held Products, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), where the similarity between goods in the same class for the identical word sign DOLPHIN was assessed on the application of EU law's well-known relevant factors including, among other things, nature, intended purpose, method of use, whether the goods… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:16 am
See Butterfield v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:15 pm
On June 16, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Universal Health Services v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 7:00 am
Sterling Mets, L.P. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:41 am
Michael v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 12:00 am
Michael v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 4:23 am
But I think that what has gotten me where I am today is the attitude of optimisim v pessimism. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
Suprema, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:35 am
" The Board found that "software is merely incidental to [Lens.com's] retail sale of contact lenses, and is not a 'good in trade.'" Lens.com, Inc. v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., 103 USPQ2d 1672 (Fed. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 5:59 pm
Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:52 am
Barber v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 9:30 pm
In reviewing case law on the issue of gifts, and the presumption of advancement, I came across the family law case of Hansen v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 9:30 pm
In reviewing case law on the issue of gifts, and the presumption of advancement, I came across the family law case of Hansen v. [read post]
