Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 4,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
Jindal on the request of Lord Swaraj Paul and the Machino Group who is wholly and solely responsible for the formation of this company and that all the initial expenses for over a period of one year was borne by the Machino Group and that the Caparo Groups’ contribution came only a year after its incorporation when the company had already passed its take off stage. 6. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
The English Court encountered this situation recently in R v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
It marked the United States’ largest military campaign to date, involving 1.2 million soldiers of the American Expeditionary Force. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
There are good things in this book, but much of it we have heard before – although I did not know until now that the infamous response letter in the matter of Arkell v Pressdram did not put off the claimant, and that litigation ensued anyway (albeit unsuccessful). [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
The Trump Court may undo this, and overrule the gay marriage case (Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Although the analysis focuses on the history of patent law in the United States, it develops themes that illuminate the evolution of patent regimes in Europe [In this regard, the US is the sun to Europe's moon. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:00 am
The continual state of “fear and anguish” (comp. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 4:49 am
[v] I don’t think it was even close. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
State of Kerala & Anr. 2000(6) SCC 359 and State of Bombay Vs. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
We note that Lord Phillips in Spiller v Joseph also doubted the need for this requirement…Any article 8 concerns are properly the subject of the law governing privacy, not defamation. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The task for the drafter of the code is to make sense of all of this, taking account of the law as it had developed in and after the House of Lords decision in Ahmad v Newham LBC (links to our note), as well as the policy desire since the days of Caroline Flint as housing minister to "reward" those in or seeking employment through allocations priorities. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am
The task for the drafter of the code is to make sense of all of this, taking account of the law as it had developed in and after the House of Lords decision in Ahmad v Newham LBC (links to our note), as well as the policy desire since the days of Caroline Flint as housing minister to "reward" those in or seeking employment through allocations priorities. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:17 am
If you can’t, here’s my translation: Lot’s Wife Behind the Lord’s angel, enormous and shining, The righteous man followed along the black hill. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:47 am
Secondly, the Court stated [66] that while the prosecution and defence arguments may be of assistance to the judge, there are interests – presumably the interest in open justice – that they cannot always adequately represent: ‘… there are some cases, of which the present… may be an example, where the judge would be greatly assisted by an independent lawyer assigned to provide assistance in the same way as in the present case both the [trial] judge and this… [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
The subject of this little rant was the dispute in Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:49 am
Senior judges have repeatedly noted the excesses of the Spiliada regime, in terms of the time, expense and judicial resource spent in litigating questions about the appropriate forum (see, most recently, Lord Briggs in Vedanta Resources Plc v Lungowe [2019] UKSC 20, [6]-[14]), yet they and the rule makers have done little or nothing about it. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:02 am
A priority claim was thereby added, the prior art was then no longer within the state of the art, and the opponent’s case was effectively over. [read post]
