Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 55,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2016, 11:53 am
When Judge Bybee (joined by Judge Rawlinson) writes the majority opinion in a death penalty habeas case, and grants relief, you should already have a very good sense that he's right. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 1:46 pm
Probably helps that the government lawyer was (1) respectful, (2) right on the underlying merits (at least according to the majority), and (3) a former Ninth Circuit clerk. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:48 pm
To summarize the underlying dispute, it appears that the minority shareholder thought that the majority owners were totally diverting profits from the restaurant to themselves. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:45 am
He doesn't seem to like much of anything about what counsel for appellants have done.The overwhelming majority of the opinion is about the quality of the briefing, and the arguments therein, rather than on the actual merits of the case. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:27 pm
Here's an interesting decision where the majority imposes appellate sanctions for a frivolous appeal (about $30K) -- but there's a dissent: Counsel’s failure to provide a complete record, while clearly inexcusable, does not rise to the level of sanctionable conduct. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 3:14 pm
As well as makes whatever supplications to higher powers that may or may not have transpired.Then, in December, one of the members of the majority, Judge Kozinski, leaves the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:44 am
The question is whether the prosecutor improperly used a peremptory challenge to dismiss the only African-American in the juror pool.Judge Fisher writes the majority opinion. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 12:43 pm
But the "Summary" is incredibly long.In part, that's a result of there being (1) a majority opinion, (2) a concurrence, and (3) a dissent. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 5:55 pm
The majority says that Audi AG can indeed be sued here, whereas the dissent says that, at least on this record, it can't.So your answer is "right" either way. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 1:15 pm
Back in 2016, Judge O'Scannlain authored this opinion, and Judge Fisher's dissent summarized the relevant holding as follows:"When a sitting juror is alleged to have continuously texted a judge friend about the trial and relayed the judge’s information to the jury, the majority concludes the trial court need not investigate further – and the jury verdict would not violate due process. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
Judge Ikuta authored the majority opinion, and Judge Christen dissented.Although the plaintiff here wanted to secretly record communications involving public issues (e.g., public officials, BLM officers, etc.), the holding seems to me to apply equally to secretly recording even routine conversations with your neighbors, coworkers, etc. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 10:00 am
Search Our Site The post Feltington v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 1:08 pm
Nelson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:07 am
Serco Ltd (t/a Serco Docklands) v National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers; London and Birmingham Railway Ltd (t/a London Midland) v Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen [2011] EWCA Civ 226; [2011] WLR (D) 72 “Where a trade union proposed to take industrial action there was no obligation on the union for the purpose of section 230(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 to explain any more than how the lists and… [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 12:18 pm
See Liljeberg v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 12:27 pm
I particularly think that the majority’s result is all but dictated by Supreme Court’s 1979 Bell v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:47 am
Flook and Diamond v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 6:38 am
First, Wickard v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 9:21 am
Deveneau v. [read post]
