Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 178,381
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2008, 5:34 pm
The California Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five), issued an unpublished opinion yesterday reversing a punitive damages award because the plaintiff failed to present evidence of the defendant's net worth. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:06 am
Here's an interesting profile of a sole practitioner who sees himself as a champion of "lots and lots of little guys": Once a self-described hippie, Phil Gordon takes on class-action suits, Idaho Statesman, Jan. 18, 2007.Gordon's cases include cases:against Micron Technology on behalf of buyers of memory chips alleging price fixing and securities fraud.against Morrison Knudsen on behalf of shareholders of Raytheon.against Louisiana Pacific for defective siding… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 12:26 pm
Whether it’s because of the credit crunch or because defendants are pushing more cases to trial, litigation funding companies are increasingly marketing their services to cash-strapped plaintiffs who have large medical bills but possibly an even larger legal recovery on the horizon. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:43 pm
Moreover, Rinaldi's signature stamp was not placed on any documents until after the closing. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
In this case, the court noted that the Plaintiff’s expert denied having any opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 10:01 pm
June 5, 2018), Oklahoma District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange ruled that the plaintiff did violate Federal rules by not disclosing the communications its counsel had with the third parties referenced in plaintiff’s counsel’s time records, but found that the defendant’s proposed sanction was an “extremely harsh sanction not warranted by the circumstances involved” and limited the...Read the whole entry... [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:13 am
The defendant denied all the plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 11:51 am
Plaintiff's lawyer also got sanctioned by the district court, which said the lawyer did not conduct a reasonable investigation into this issue when the Hospital's lawyer brought it to his attention and allowed plaintiff to spoliate evidence by failing to adequately advise plaintiff to preserve her iPhones and her data. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:51 am
The Court of Appeals (Livingston, Park and Chin) says plaintiff's association with Jenkins was a real problem. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 8:27 am
" That reasoning is now vacated as per the Second Circuit's ruling in this case. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
Thus, since the information supporting the account is presumptively in plaintiff’s possession, and it is defendant’s opportunity afforded by law to obtain detail of this claim from the information that was kept in Plaintiffs books and records. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 3:06 pm
On plaintiff-husband’s motion: In moving for an order compelling paternity testing, plaintiff-husband is asking the court to disregard his prior sworn statements that, if true, would exclude him from being the child’s father. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:08 am
Liskow lawyers Cherrell Taplin and Melanie Derefinko recently secured a ruling in their favor dismissing the entirety of Plaintiffs’ claims against Liskow’s client, ExxonMobil Product Solutions Company (“ExxonMobil”). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 6:08 am
Liskow lawyers Cherrell Taplin and Melanie Derefinko recently secured a ruling in their favor dismissing the entirety of Plaintiffs’ claims against Liskow’s client, ExxonMobil Product Solutions Company (“ExxonMobil”). [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:26 am
Brown, 131 S. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Once KKR agreed, Barclays sought and obtained Del Monte’s permission. [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 7:23 am
The plaintiff had alleged that exposure to defendant’s benzene-containing products caused his rare leukemia (Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (“APL”)). [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:49 am
The district court granted Qualcomm’s motion, but gave plaintiff 30 days leave to amend. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 6:33 am
.), the court granted a Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss a Plaintiff’s slip and fall action where the court found that the Plaintiff failed to allege facts that would plausibly support a claim that a dangerous condition was the cause of the Plaintiff’s fall. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:47 am
It was for the jury to decide whether the plaintiff’s property was “of sufficient size and weight to cause plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
