Search for: "State v. Quick"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 4,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:55 pm
The company then presses for a quick settlement. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP finance) In the midst of a financial meltdown, smart companies will increase strategic IP management efforts (IP finance) Intellectual Property Colloquium - IP podcast site (The Trademark Blog) Open Access Day - 14 October (Spicy IP) Quick question - 'non-asserts' as licence? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
” The article reports views from a conference in the United States where the attendees noted there was a whole new industry of reputation-restoration firms like the UK-based Kwikch [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Their opinion said that the majority has now “declared that animus must have been the only conceivable motivation for a sovereign state to have remained committed to a definition of marriage that has existed for millenia….Even worse, we have overruled the will of seven million California Proposition 8 voters based on a reading of Romer [v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:32 am
That was until 1977, when the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bates v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:54 pm
Tax Petitioners v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 2:00 pm
However, from a legal standpoint, as recently discussed by the North Carolina Supreme Court in Blue v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
Umberg has stated he will recommend this course of action to the committee. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
What are states going to do? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Before we start, a quick civics lesson. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Supreme Court Uproots Weeds in Garden State’s Law of Expert Witnesses” (Aug. 8, 2018). 4 2018 WL 3636867, at *20 (citing the Reference Manual 3d ed., at 597-99). 5 Cook v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm
The answer – according to settled case law – is that the term ‘Member States’ refers to ‘government authorities of the Member States’ (see, for example, Région wallonne v Commission (para. 6.)). [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 2:13 pm
The USPTO’s ‘Quick Reference Sheet’ describing the new eligibility test can be found here. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 12:56 am
By David RangavizState v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Bell v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
First, legislative measures like the DMA, regulatory intervention such as the ongoing DG COMP investigation of the Google Play Store, and litigation (in less than a week, the Ninth Circuit will hear Epic v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:00 pm
California, a 1927 decision upholding the right of a Communist to advocate overthrow of the United States government. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:50 pm
The lawsuit also states that the proportionality gap is equal to around 50 opportunities. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
So, to understand this clash of titans, let’s take a quick look at the main issues that require consideration. [read post]
