Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 3921 - 3940 of 9,858
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2017, 1:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
For instance, the burden onPapst is mitigated by Papst’s status as a non-practicingpatent holder residing outside the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 11:43 am by Joanna L. Grossman
  All women will be affected by these developments.Outside of the United States, the attack on women’s health care is even more devastating. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Reuters reports that the United States strongly believes that the killing was ordered by Kim Jong Un. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am by Bob Farb
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:01 am by Charlotte Garden
United States, Fourth Amendment reasonableness determinations are reviewed de novo – and, he contends, a decision whether to enforce an agency subpoena is just a reasonableness determination by another name. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:59 am by Kate Howard
United States 16-5454 Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:58 am by Elsie Gonzalez, Esq.
Supreme Court decisions regarding the fundamental right to parent one’s child, he wrote:  “United States Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote on behalf of the Court in the case of Troxel v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:24 am by David Post
The Government has pointed to no evidence that any alien from any of the countries named in the Order has perpetrated a terrorist attack in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
United States, a 1997 Supreme Court case holding that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]