Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 7,620
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2014, 8:56 pm
The circumstance arises when an applicant "provokes" an interference by copying a claim of third party application or patent. [read post]
20 May 2014, 2:02 pm
The issue arose because under Maryland law to secure a no fault divorce a couple must have voluntarily separated from one another for 12 months prior to the filing of the application for divorce. [read post]
20 May 2014, 1:39 pm
Reece Smith, Jr. [read post]
20 May 2014, 1:25 pm
Reed Smith attorneys have prepared a Client Alert summarizing and analyzing the OIG’s proposed rule, including the various scenarios under which CMPs could be issued under the proposed regulations, such as: failure to report and return an overpayment; failure to grant OIG timely access to records upon request; ordering or prescribing items or services while excluded from a federal health care program, as well as arranging or contracting with an individual or entity who meets this… [read post]
19 May 2014, 8:56 am
” The OIG now has published a new proposed rule that would greatly expand the bases upon which it could affirmatively exclude an individual or entity from participation in federal health care programs, and Reed Smith lawyers Carol Loepere, Elizabeth Carder-Thompson, Scot Hasselman, Katie Hurley, and Erin Atkins have prepared a full summary of this proposed rule. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:50 pm
We also discuss how these proposed changes to the OIG’s exclusion authorities could impact the debarment authority applicable to government contracts more generally. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:50 am
The Reed Smith Health Industry Washington Watch blog has been updated to report on recent health policy developments, including the following: HHS Regulatory Developments. [read post]
14 May 2014, 11:51 am
Reed Smith is preparing Client Alerts regarding both rules, which will be available shortly. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Smith (piracy), The Armistad (slavery), a dissent in Brown v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:53 am
Justice Smith filed a separate concurring opinion, while Justice Rivera dissented (Santer v Board of Education of East Meadow Union Free School District, May 6, 2014, Abdus-Salaam, S). [read post]
9 May 2014, 4:49 am
Smith, . . . [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:54 pm
Scott McLellan is senior counsel in the Austin office of Constangy, Brooks & Smith, LLP. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
” In contrast, Justice Rivera dissented, stating that “I dissent from the majority's decision because I can find no legal or factual error in the Appellate Division's application of the Pickering balancing test to the facts of these cases. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:04 pm
Smith however does hold that criminal trespass cannot found an adverse possession claim. [read post]
7 May 2014, 1:00 pm
This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog only. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:05 pm
I appreciate Randy’s consistent application of his “unprecedented” principle of constitutional interpretation from the Obamacare case. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:09 am
Second problem that the issue raised in application of Smith to the internet isn’t a criticism of Smith (which deserves criticism, but for other reasons), but the extension of Smith beyond the stretch of the rubric. [read post]
4 May 2014, 10:04 am
Smith, Silverman and Bea. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:00 pm
But judge-made policy it is and, as we all know, its most common application in the IP context is by analogy to classic case of Fonovisa: The flea-market owner held liable for knowingly permitting sales of infringing merchandise on his premises. [read post]
2 May 2014, 8:00 am
He also offers an application of his views on those broader questions to a narrower, more practical issue: the law of religious freedom. [read post]
