Search for: "Court, U.S. Supreme Court" Results 3941 - 3960 of 99,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am by Sasha Volokh
The Supreme Court disapproved this, saying that private prosecutors appointed to prosecute criminal contempt should be as disinterested as public prosecutors. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:30 am
The mission of the Law Library of Congress is to provide authoritative legal research, reference and instruction services, and access to an unrivaled collection of U.S., foreign, comparative, and international law. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
During his campaign for president in 1980, Ronald Reagan had promised to nominate a woman to the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 5:33 am by Richard Pildes
From Lawrence Hurley at NBC News: The Supreme Court on Friday is set to consider for the first time whether to hear appeals brought by people charged with offenses relating to the Jan. 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
ISRAEL-HAMAS WAR — US RESPONSE U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court rejected their application for an emergency stay. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Applying new regimes of statutory interpretation to statutes enacted at a time when earlier interpretive regimes were in place is always somewhat problematic.Which brings us to statutory stare decisis (that is, statutory precedent by the courts); the fact that the other federal courts of appeals, and the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Binger Center for New Americans, University of Minnesota Law School, Nov. 28, 2023 "This practice advisory describes some of the common tools of statutory construction to assist practitioners in advocating for narrow definitions of generic criminal removal grounds before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) and the U.S. courts of appeals. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
“New hire forces law firm’s disqualification” — “A law firm could not avoid disqualification by screening a newly hired associate from a client matter in which she had a conflict of interest, the New Mexico Supreme Court has ruled in reversing judgment. [read post]