Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF T W" Results 3941 - 3960 of 8,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2016, 12:23 pm
  “[I]t is proper to deny discovery of matter that is relevant only. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am by Dennis Crouch
  In other words, the entirety of the claimed subject matter that passes through the eligibility gate is evaluated for novelty and nonobviousness. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
It puts other people uncomfortably in the middle of the friction between you and your ex-wife and they don't want to hear that. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:10 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  [W]e must maintain our spirit. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am by Marty Lederman
First, the government confirms in detail, at pages 3-6 of its reply brief, what I surmised last week:  Both of the conditions would undermine the government's furtherance of its compelling interests, principally because there would be state-law obstacles to the creation of contraception-only insurance policies, and because the "opt in" requirement would impose burdens on women that their male counterparts do not share and that would, as a practical matter, decrease the… [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 5:27 pm by LindaMBeale
I was at a housewarming party last Saturday and talked to quite a few people I didn't know. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:34 am
  The court went on to note that[t]wo New Mexico cases have provided specific guidance regarding the unit of prosecution for charges under the Act. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:06 pm by Kevin
It was only a matter of time before unpleasantness began. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 2:53 pm
   It just wasn’t enough, and the court correctly granted summary judgment for the defendants. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark There have been several very high profile news reports of significant law firm data breaches. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:49 am by SHG
  When you’re running a business, it doesn’t matter why people click, only that people click. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:36 am
  The Court of Appeals then explained that[w]e skip to the question whether McGinnis's actions violated any clearly established right. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 5:17 am
" Ordinarily, I wouldn't rely on an unpublished federal trial court opinion for state law issues, but I particularly like this summary (and it relies on published Pennsylvania appellate court opinions):[W]e note that "the presumption under Pennsylvania law is that all employment is at-will, and, therefore, an employee may be discharged for any reason or no reason. [read post]