Search for: "In re T. W." Results 3941 - 3960 of 8,740
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2015, 7:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Every country w/lower tax rates than us has done this w/o burdening advertising—why are we the only country that needs to do so? [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:45 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
If you’re the kind of client who shows up at the beginning of the tax season with a few forms and promises to provide the rest later and then next month, you might have a few more forms and by the end of March, you might even have most of their forms W-2 and 1099 to your preparer – but not those expense records – you’re the dribbler. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 5:41 am
Now the neocons who treated W. like a host body for their own agenda are swirling around Jeb, ready to inhabit another President Bush.... [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 2:07 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
In sending the case back to the lower courts for re-examination, Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the majority, asked that courts consider “[W]hy, when the employer accommodated so many, could it not accommodate pregnant women as well? [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
An important caveat: The Supreme Court recognized that issue preclusion won’t apply to agency decision when Congress so indicates. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
  See In re Accutane Products Liability, 511 F. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am by Venkat Balasubramani
As Judge Chhabria, who is hearing the Lyft dispute, notes, “[w]hether a worker is classified as an employee or an independent contractor has great consequences. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:27 pm by Ted Brooks
        Iceberg Resin TableNow you don’t need to run out right away and purchase all of this, since we’re talking several thousand dollars for just the basics. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court must decide whether the approach to ordering costs to be paid by local authorities in care proceedings set out in Re T (Children) [2012] UKSC 36 extends to the costs of appeals from orders made in such proceedings.. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 4:57 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Rabinowitz, one of Butamax's experts, avers that,[w]here the only cofactor in the environment is NADPH, such as in the Arfin & Umbarger assay, a KARI will use that cofactor exclusively because [**15] it is the only one present. [read post]