Search for: "Law v. USA"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 6,906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2013, 3:19 pm
"The law was crafted to allow the NSA to obtain only records that were relevant to 'an authorized investigation.' [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:05 pm
.; White House keeps losing SCOTUS cases 9-0, and there might be a lesson in that [Ilya Somin/USA Today, more] “Another big term for amicus curiae briefs at the high court” [ABA Journal] “The Chief’s dissent reads over long stretches like something from the Cato Institute” [Michael Greve, Liberty Law Blog, on the administrative law case City of Arlington v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 2:00 am
Source: USA Today (April 29, 2013). [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 10:31 am
See Rolls–Royce PLC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:51 am
Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech, Doug Kendall in USA Today urges the president, in the wake of the Court’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:15 pm
USA, Inc., 367 F.3d 1381, 1385 (Fed. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:34 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
DOES 1-99 ND Illi 2013http://t.co/namjuCtHIZ -> Supreme Court Denies Leave To Appeal In C-Map USA Inc., et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 426 (2003), and Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
DOES 1-99 ND Illi 2013http://t.co/namjuCtHIZ -> Supreme Court Denies Leave To Appeal In C-Map USA Inc., et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 1:52 am
He then moved on to consider the process by which the Supreme Court might come to be regarded as the UK’s ‘constitutional court’, noting: “An explicit constitutional amendment would not be required to convert the Supreme Court into the UK’s constitutional court; the decision of Marbury v Madison was the watershed moment in the USA, and a similar decision might be made in the UK in due course. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:50 am
SuperMedia LLC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:56 am
” Pandrol, USA v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:51 pm
Trazo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:22 pm
In East Sussex Children Services v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 7:48 am
The legislation can be broken down into four broad categories: 1) substantive reforms to the laws the NSA believes allow it to conduct its surveillance programs, 2) disclosure of the FISA Court opinions that determined the programs were legal, 3) general reporting of the number and types of surveillance orders received by recipients and how many users affected, and 4) reforms to the FISA Court. [read post]
