Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 19,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
Keegan.This case was prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Philip V. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
The interim between James Monroe’s presidency and the Civil War was marked by extreme sectional division over many political issues, including protectionism v. free trade; annexation of new territories (Texas, California, and Oregon); and state nullification of federal law. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 11:20 am
Minnesota is in the Eighth Circuit, and courts here are guided by the SquirtCo factors (named for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals’ 1980 ruling in SquirtCo v Seven-Up Co.). [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:03 am
The last date, of course, marks the night on which the jury in Florida v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Jaikumar Vijayan of Computerworld previews Tuesday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:29 am
Chavez-Mesa v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:03 pm
[PLR 5707309730A; Mark B. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:03 pm
” SportFuel, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:24 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:02 am
Maker’s Mark Distiller, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:02 am
Maker’s Mark Distiller, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 10:02 am
Maker’s Mark Distiller, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Mark J.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
United States, characterizing it as “one of several recent signs that ideology does not always fuel the justices’ decisions. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
In The Law Society v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:39 am
This year marks the fifth legislative session in which Texas lawmakers have failed to pass legislation to establish procedures to memorialize Atkins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:46 am
These conditions are also cumulative (Gateway v OHIM, C‑57/08 P). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:46 am
The reputation must also be prior to the filing of the contested trade mark; it must exist in the territory concerned and for the goods and/or services on which the opposition is based, andRisk of injury: registration of the contested trade mark would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or repute of the earlier trade markCase law (T-345/08, Rubinstein and L'Oréal v OHMI) has clarified that the requirements above are… [read post]
