Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 39,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:50 pm
The Exception at Issue In Polselli v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:58 pm
In 2011 the EEOC determined in Veretto v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
A TRANSCRIPT OF THE COMMENTARY IN THE FIRST TELEVISED UK TRIAL R V KEVIN PIETERLAG AND JOHNNY ‘ROBBERS’ ROBBER Charon QC: Good morning everybody…Welcome to The Old Bailey on day one of a five day trial in the case of R v Kevin Pieterlag and Johnny ‘Robbers’ Robbers. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am
In Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor, the Supreme Court has given judgments that will not be welcomed by the tenant community. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm
A nice summary of the meaning of these requirements in the context of criminal law provisions was provided by Lord Hope in R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] 1 AC 345, at paragraph 41: Accessibility means that an individual must know from the wording of the relevant provision and, if need be, with the assistance of the court’s interpretation of it what acts and omissions will make him criminally liable: see also Gülmez v Turkey (Application No… [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 10:06 am
People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:02 am
Clair v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:50 pm
Welch v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:20 pm
In Gorzynski v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:54 pm
See Teter v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
Many of the cases involved the arrest of people who had posted critical remarks about politicians on social networking sites. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 2:38 pm
I doubt I will be quite so prolific this week as I am going to be back on a suppression hearing on Tuesday and maybe Wednesday in People v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:15 am
People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 3:52 pm
Recently, in People v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:14 am
A recent court case out of Georgia -- State v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 3:12 pm
In an early case, 1984’s Southland Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:26 pm
People ought to be bound by what they sign, especially when it comes to real estate. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
"The American people have no reason in the world to think it's going to work just like the president paints it," said one of those backers, Senator Pete V. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:07 pm
By Eric Goldman The Barrett v. [read post]
