Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 3941 - 3960
of 71,787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2021, 5:13 am
Long before enactment of the BCL, New York’s highest court held in Darcy v Brooklyn & N.Y. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly… [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 6:40 pm
Court of Appeal stated in R. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 1:27 pm
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2021) EWCA Civ 77 This is the Court of Appeal judgment of Croydon’s appeal from the High Court decision that we noted here. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am
Act § 1089[d] did not warrant reversal of change of permanency goal where it heard extensive testimony regarding the child’s emotional state and best interests, In Matter of Isayah R., 189 A.D.3d 1942 (3d Dept.,2021) respondent was the mother of a child (born in 2010) who had special needs. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:01 am
It agreed with the District Court’s conclusion that Appellant met her burden of showing L.S. was well-settled in the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 3:41 pm
R. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 1:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 10:50 am
The order states: The Honorable Carlos F. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:15 pm
Wilkinson and United States Fish and Wildlife Serv. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 2:58 pm
From Savanage v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
On this episode, plaintiffs from the landmark case of Monroe v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 9:24 am
An article on the State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:57 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
The three Degraffenreid dissenters suggest that stray dicta from an 1892 case that in no way involved the limits that a state constitution might place on a state legislature in this arena—and casual quotation from this case in a part of the discredited Bush v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 2:22 pm
“Wrongful Discharge” claims were recognized by our state Supreme Court decades ago. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:47 am
Following the UK’s departure from the EU, these reciprocal arrangements have ceased. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:24 am
The Court found that the developer’s “work [] could not be readily undone without undue hardship” – citing from Matter of Weeks Woodland Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
