Search for: "State v. Save" Results 3941 - 3960 of 11,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2010, 9:24 pm
Co. of Am., 94 NY2d 330 ["out-of-pocket premium payments [for life insurance policies] would vanish within a stated period of time"]; Monter v Massachusetts Mut. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:10 am by Ronald London
By Ronnie London Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a decision in Soppet v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 1:56 pm by CMS
However, Article 4 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (Commencement No.5 and Saving Provision) Order (SI 2013/77) (“the LASPO Order”) listed several exemptions to the general rule, including: “proceedings in England and Wales brought by a person acting in the capacity of – a liquidator of a company which is being wound up in England and Wales or Scotland under Part IV and V of the (Insolvency Act 1986)”. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:07 am by Susan Brenner
The user does not manually save the cache files, but can access them and `print, rename, [or] save [them] elsewhere, the same thing [he or she could] do with any other file’. . . . [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Doing so would let the state close, conservatively, 12 to 20 of its 112 prison units over the same period, saving hundreds of millions of dollars per year. [read post]
5 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Good (07-562), on whether federal law preempts state tort claims against tobacco manufacturers over the marketing of “light” cigarettes; Locke v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
NPR’s Planet Money, in a recent episode, “Lives v Economy,” framed the issue, “A question we've been hearing lately: ‘Is it worth it to shut down the economy to save lives? [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The code states that “disclosure of information from surveillance systems must be controlled and consistent with the purpose(s) for which the system was established“. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm by Matthew Hill
Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2 – Read judgment  (On appeal from [2010] EWCA Civ 698  and [2009] EWHC 1827 ) At first sight, Article 2 – the ‘right to life’ – seems to be a prohibition on extra-judicial executions and state-sponsored death squads. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
And, in other news from the FJC, check out the most recent addition to the Center's unit to our Famous Federal Trials series, U.S. v. [read post]