Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 11,367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm
CEQA Litigation/Procedural Issues Various of California’s District Courts of Appeal rendered notable decisions on a number of issues relating to the procedures and rules governing the conduct of CEQA litigation, including the following holdings: Res judicata will not apply to bar a subsequent action on the same claim between the same parties unless the first judgment was on the merits. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
In contrast to the Tree Top Court’s unwillingness to infer an implied demand, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, in Scottsdale Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:44 am
" In particular, he notes that of seven such lateral moves since 1980, five were moves to the California state judiciary, noting that California is "near the very top of the professionalism score measure. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:38 am
But barring activists from employing ruses to gain employment at such a facility is permissible. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
After the federal law expired, several states, including California, enacted their own surcharge bans. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:17 am
After the federal law expired, several states, including California, enacted their own surcharge bans. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 5:05 pm
” The complaint further asserts that the federal forum provisions, designating a court other than the courts of Delaware as the preferred forum, are inconsistent with Delaware Corporations Code Section 115, which bars bylaw provisions that “prohibit brining such claims in the court of this State. [read post]
6 Jan 2018, 4:35 pm
The California State Bar Court Hearing Department recommends disbarment of an attorney for criminal conduct On March 7, 2016, a Sex Offender Registration Enforcement officer from the Jackson County, Missouri Sheriffs Office filed a complaint in the Jackson County Municipal... [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:25 am
He also points out that under the California Supreme Court case Ross v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:44 am
Third, several court cases create significant bars to the strategy. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
Briefly: For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage reports that at their conference this morning the justices will consider a cert petition that asks them to overturn a case that bars “states from requiring mail-order sellers to collect sales taxes if the vendors ha[ve] no ‘physical presence’ in that state,” noting that “lawyers for 35 states, including California, are urging the high court to overturn the… [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:17 am
The move is almost certainly prompted by the decision of California voters to legalize possession and recreational use of marijuana within the state. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:05 am
Although public safety is a compelling state interest, the court finds that a blanket restriction on Manning's churchgoing is not narrowly tailored to suit this interest. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are 2 CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm
As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 8:59 am
Fingerprint Background Checks The California Department of Justice (DOJ) is mandated to maintain the statewide criminal record repository for the State of California. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 7:38 pm
Ken, of course, is a California lawyer. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm
Another justice stated to Appellants' counsel [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:20 am
Private universities aren't legally bound by this (except in California, where a state law applies Free Speech Clause rules to them); but public universities, such as Texas A&M and UT, certainly are. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
The Turtles ongoing tri-state litigation against SiriusXM over the satellite radio broadcaster's refusal to pay to broadcast pre-1972 sound recordings reached the the Florida Supreme Court, who looked again at Judge Darrin Gayle's decision which found in favour of SiriusXM and agreed that "There is no specific Florida legislation covering sound recording property rights, nor is there a bevy of case law interpreting common law copyright related to the arts"… [read post]
