Search for: "True v True"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 33,930
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2022, 1:28 pm
Harley’s Hope Found. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm
In Donna Banks v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:03 am
” (Grewal v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:01 pm
When a person is prosecuted for violating Virginia battery law, what re some common defenses that might win if provable as true? [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
Supreme Court denied Westbury's motion and Westbury appealed the court's ruling.Citing Shah v Exxis, Inc., 138 AD3d 970, the Appellate Division explained that "[on] a motion pursuant to CPLR §3211(a)(7) to dismiss [an action] for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any… [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Brown v Velez, 153 AD3d 517, the Appellate Division observed that at an administrative expungement hearing to determine whether a report of child abuse or maltreatment is substantiated, the allegations in the report must be established "by a preponderance of the evidence"*. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 6:14 am
Read the decision at: Monsanto Canada Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 6:22 am
The Court of Appeals sustains the verdict against him.The case is Barger v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:35 am
The facts alleged in the motion, if true, would constitute proper cause or change in circumstances. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:11 am
Many, many years ago he was told (by a solicitor, so it must be true, he thought) that an assignment not executed as a deed had to fulfil the requirement of contract law for consideration, and that therefore consideration was required. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
" The Appellate Division ruled that “accepting the allegations in the complaint as true, affording [Pall] the benefit of every favorable inference, and considering the evidentiary material submitted by the parties,” Pall did not have a cause of action to recover damages for defamation as the context of the alleged statement was such that a reasonable reader would have concluded that he or she was reading an opinion, and not a fact, about Pall.Addressing Pall’s claims… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
In Apache Stronghold v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 10:32 am
Worthy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:50 pm
(California Court of Appeal, June 30, 2023, Wong v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:30 am
" ATEN International Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 12:47 pm
That advice is very true for criminal defense lawyers. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
In Dahl v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:18 am
., Baker v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 11:45 am
Akes v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:05 am
In a somewhat puzzling opinion in Mosby v. [read post]
