Search for: "US Inventor"
Results 3941 - 3960
of 7,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 2:13 pm
The Board did not err in rejecting reissue claims 1– 7, 10, 12–14, and 29–38 of the ’111 patent as violating the recapture rule and all the reissue claims as being premised on a defective inventor reissue declaration. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:43 am
This provided a more liberal pathway for knowledge transfer but disadvantaged the “idea-vendors” / inventors who were unable to commercialize their ideas. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:27 am
Furthermore, a known (non-medicinal) product for a new use is not considered novel, because disclosure of the use does not require the inventor to disclose any technical contribution. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:14 am
ALJ Rogers noted ITC precedent denying requests similar to Apple’s, where it should be reasonable for Apple to expect these documents to be used for the purposes of the ownership defense even though the documents were not specifically itemized in response to an interrogatory, when these documents were addressed in expert reports and numerous depositions, including a deposition of Kodak’s witness on the ownership defense. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 6:28 am
Although this claim is perhaps not entirely functional, the Supreme Court has also chastised partially-functional claiming: But the vice of a functional claim exists not only when a claim is ‘wholly’ functional, if that is ever true, but also when the inventor is painstaking when he recites what has already been seen, and then uses conveniently functional language at the exact point of novelty. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Constitution, which grants “authors and inventors” exclusive rights to their work to “promote the progress of science and useful arts. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
Provisur sued Weber for infringing two of its patents relating to high-speed mechanical slicers used to slice and package meats and cheeses. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 2:44 pm
For me, the case is largely about the strong presumption that the listed inventors are correct. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:48 am
§ 102 will move the United States closer to a first-to-file system, but will retain a limited one-year grace period for filing an application after a public disclosure made by the inventor, made by another who obtained the disclosed information from the inventor, or made after such an inventor-derived public disclosure. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
This helps us identify trends, and helps us pinpoint very specific areas for training. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 5:48 am
§ 102 will move the United States closer to a first-to-file system, but will retain a limited one-year grace period for filing an application after a public disclosure made by the inventor, made by another who obtained the disclosed information from the inventor, or made after such an inventor-derived public disclosure. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 7:40 pm
Cir. 2014) (“Par’sargument, however, ignores that we are not limited to thesame motivation that may have motivated the inventors. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 1:52 pm
We know how Barr is going to use his power on the “best practices” panel: to break encryption. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 9:19 pm
Among the three co-inventors, Mr. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:14 am
Linguists have developed a phonetic pronunciation guides, but those use quirky non-english letters. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:25 am
In at least one case, the examiner made and mailed his determination prior to reviewing the Peer-to-Patent submission.1 From a comparison of the Information Disclosure Statements, identifying references submitted by the inventor and references submitted by the public via Peer-to-Patent, examiners seem to be more than twice as likely to use a Peer- to-Patent-submitted reference than an applicant-submitted reference. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
It's a useful exercise, or case study, to compare the two patents and, at a high level, their validity challenges. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:53 am
Constitution, Article One, Section 8: “To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 11:34 am
Section 183 outlines the conditions for an inventor's right to compensation, which is valid for six years from the date of issue on the patent, and includes compensation for government use, and for damages caused by the secrecy order. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 8:22 am
Sullivan should be named as a co-inventor on the SmartDoor application. [read post]
