Search for: "V D" Results 3941 - 3960 of 76,305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm by Adam Levitin
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court finally issued its long-awaited ruling in Eaton v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
En ne les présentant qu'au stade du recours, elle empêche la Chambre de vérifier le bien fondé de la décision de la division d'examen. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
In OP v Commune d’Ans [2023] EUECJ C‑148/22, the Grand Chamber handed down a preliminary ruling following a request by the Tribunal du Travail de Liège. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
I'd have thought that to do this in every single criminal case would be clearly improper, and that everyone would recognize this fact.I'd have been wrong.The Court of Appeal does reverse the conviction here. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Once again, there are a host of things worth watching in the world of D&O. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 5:16 am by Walter Olson
And at Cato’s Constitution Day on September 17 I’ll be discussing my forthcoming piece on EEOC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:49 pm by admin
Il faut un certain sens  de sagesse et manière de faire avec doigté de la part du conseil d’affaires pour vérifier la situation, peser les conséquences de faire certaines déclarations en contre de l’idée du client, et de choisir le comportement approprié en vue d’avancer sur la ligne très mince qui dépeint un véritable avocat du client. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:04 am by sally
Copple and others v Littlewoods plc and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1281; [2011] WLR (D) 319 “Where an employer’s pension scheme indirectly discriminated against part-timers on the ground of sex by denying them access to the scheme, a female part-time worker was not entitled to any remedy arising from her exclusion from the scheme if she would not in fact have chosen to join the scheme even if she had been eligible to do so.” WLR Daily, 8th November 2011 Source:… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:38 am by tracey
Pannone LLP v Aardvark Digital Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 803;  [2011] WLR (D)  223 “The court had power to extend the time for compliance with a court order, pursuant to CPR r 3.1(2)(a), and to grant relief from a sanction prescribed by a court order as the consequence of a failure to comply within a specified time, pursuant to CPR r 3.8, even where the order had been made by consent. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm by Peter J. Toren
On August 20, the Seventh Circuit in Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:15 am by IPWatchdog
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Monday in Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 5:05 am by Brian Iverson
Supreme Court struck down the Lanham Act’s disparagement clause as unconstitutional in Matal v. [read post]