Search for: "Doe I" Results 3961 - 3980 of 259,162
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
In contrast, for a patent owner, the mere possibility that an accused infringer could potentially obtain a license from another party does not automatically deprive the patent owner of its exclusionary rights and standing to sue. [read post]
The FTC weighed in just this week with yet another update, so I thought we could talk to Connecticut employees about what is this update, what is the FTC, and what does this mean for them? [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:31 am by Jillian C. York
Does the fact that the internet is speech, does that make it different from cars? [read post]
1 May 2024, 8:18 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Likewise, the content is not tailored to any particular situation and does not necessarily address all relevant issues. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:31 am by Jean O'Grady
As a former New Yorker I am astonished that it took four years to reach these two suburban boroughs. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Pozen argues it is not too late to change course, and I agree. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:05 am by Paul M. Barrett
The NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights, where I work, has advocated for Congress to enhance the consumer protection authority and resources of the U.S. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am by jonathanturley
I mean, I think he had to be thinking, I’m making this really outlandish argument, with ramifications that couldn’t possibly be squared with the text and history. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:00 am by Eugene Volokh
" Expected public reaction that impacts external relationships does not constitute a detrimental impact and does not weigh in the District's favor. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:19 am by SHG
And what does Trump have to say about all this? [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 In this post, I discuss landmark cases involving affirmative action, health care, voting rights, separation of church and state, and the Second Amendment to show, not that I disagree with the results (I do), but instead to demonstrate that no matter what side of the issues you may favor in these country-defining cases, the Roberts Court has resolved these questions in a lawless manner because of reliance on demonstrably false facts and obviously misleading… [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
I ended up assessing credibility based on the documentary record alone. [read post]