Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 15,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm
| Hästens Sängar fails in trade mark application concerning its chequered figurative mark | BREAKING: CJEU in Sky v SkyKick rules that a trade mark cannot be declared wholly or partially invalid on grounds of lack of clarity and precision of its specifications | Furry thoughts on Sky v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 1:49 am
Google, Carr v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:30 pm
Once the vendors figure it out, mass market consumers may have little ability to say "No. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
375,531 GROUP 52 RUNOFF Carol "Jodie" Breece v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] E-Mails With Graphic Anti-Gun Messages, Sent to Gun Rights Activist, Weren't Threats
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm
Times Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2018, 7:16 am
” Before the Alice v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
Relying on its earlier Community word mark IMPULSE, leading brand owner Unilever NV opposed an application by Iron & Smith Kft. to register a colour figurative sign featuring the words ‘be impulsive’ as a Hungarian trade mark. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 11:40 am
Collins, Inc. v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] E-Mails With Graphic Anti-Gun Messages, Sent to Gun Rights Activist, Weren't Threats
20 Nov 2018, 7:43 pm
Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:43 pm
Brown v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:34 am
Qiao Yongzhong's book “Maintenance time and the industry development of patents -- empirical research with evidence from China”Biosimilars battle in clearing the way - Fujifilm v AbbVie continuesFull low down on the interim decision handed down by Mr Justice Carr on 29 December in the biosimilars battle of Fujifilm Kyowa Kirin Biologics Co., Ltd and Others v AbbVie Biotechnology Limited [2016] EWHC 3383 (Ch).15 fully-funded IP PhD positions are calling for… [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:36 am
What is wrong with the Australian law in relation to unjustified threats that a Federal Court judge could make an astronomical seven-figure award of damages, when the correct sum was zero? [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 9:38 am
The trial court disagreed with both parties and awarded delay damages on the reduced figure of $233,306.98. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:22 am
It is open to debate that the percentage recovery is higher if you take into account the fact that the House of Lords figures include success fees and that the correct figure should be taken against the base costs. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:28 pm
Tyree v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:33 pm
USA v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 5:56 pm
This term, the Supreme Court will decide Wyeth v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:45 am
In Chandran v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 1:43 pm
Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
