Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*"
Results 3961 - 3980
of 6,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2013, 10:30 am
Not only does the video rank well, but the website will rank well and, depending upon your local market competition, frequently ranks well within a matter of days instead of months. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 4:41 am
Rather, while defendant did execute a will and power of attorney late in the relationship (and under dubious circumstances not addressed in the opinion), the Appellate Division held that neither document, as a matter of law, evidences any intent or promise of lifetime support. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:44 pm
It is well established that “[m]atters intimately related to foreign policy and national security are rarely proper subjects for judicial intervention,” because such matters “frequently turn on standards that defy the judicial application,” or “involve the exercise of a discretion demonstrably committed to the executive or legislature. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 4:59 am
If anyone, in or out of government, is thinking about a legal question whose answer may hinge on a better factual understanding of matters within Zelin’s expertise, shoot me a note. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:49 am
The magistrate judge also issued a show cause order requiring Harris to prove the court had subject matter jurisdiction and explain how Harris Research, a corporation, could proceed without an attorney. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 11:36 am
But my own view doesn't matter for purposes of trying to come up with reforms of the Pardon attorney. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 10:16 am
Matters touching this relationship must necessarily be recognized as of prime ecclesiastical concern." [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 7:16 am
The event is a spectacle, so and it takes creative boldness to cut through the clutter, connect with viewers, and to make an impression that matters. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
Every now and then we run into a decision that we think is wrong in so many different ways that we call it an example of “spherical error” – that is, error no matter how one looks at it. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 1:38 pm
In 1989, Phillips joined his father and brother in their general law practice in Evanston, handling a broad range of civil matters. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Supp. 2d 294 (S.D.N.Y. 2011), the court held FLSA class action waivers unenforceable as a matter of law. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:17 am
While there will undoubtedly be some gamesmanship when it comes of working toward the settlement of this matter. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 am
Johnson & Johnson–Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co., 290 F.3d 578 (3d Cir. 2002). [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 5:32 pm
He thereby failed to advise his client in all matters relevant to his retainer, to protect his client from making devises of his estate other than those which he actually intended, and to carry out his client’s instructions by all proper means. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:20 pm
According to Bloomberg, J&J defends their actions by stating that they were attempting to look out for patient interests by conducting an internal review, but that their analysis was based on too small of a sample to be generalized, unlike other published data on the matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 5:00 pm
[6] Some may argue that this sort of complexity in law may not be peculiar only to the intellectual property right laws, however, it is evident that this set of law is one of the most technical both in relation to law and subject matter.[7] Some experts are of the view that, intellectual property right laws are more ‘taxing’ than tax statutes.[8] Not only is the law difficult to understand but also expensive. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
In response to the overwhelming evidence, according to Bloomberg News, Johnson & Johnson has offered to pay $2 billion to settle this matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
In response to the overwhelming evidence, according to Bloomberg News, Johnson & Johnson has offered to pay $2 billion to settle this matter. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:41 am
That suggestion must be tongue in cheek--no matter how much the rate is lowered on the wealthy corporations making incredibly high profits, they still insist that they don't want to pay any tax. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:49 pm
’” (citations omitted)).Of experts:Also, precedent does not require “expert” opinions on matters of law. [read post]
