Search for: "M. B.1." Results 3961 - 3980 of 13,696
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2017, 5:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The plaintiff Board of Managers of Brightwater Towers Condominium (the plaintiff) moves for an order ( 1) pursuant to CPLR 2221 ( d), for leave to reargue the branch of the motion (the prior motion) of the defendants New York Engineering Associates, P.C., and Neal M. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:39 pm by Andrew Dawson
Section 1501 declares the chapter's purpose, with subpart (1)(b)(1) saying “This chapter applies where . . . assistance is sought in the United States by a foreign court or a foreign representative in connection with a foreign proceeding” – exactly the scenario in Barnet. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 12:20 pm by Colin Miller
In other words, the commitment device of a no-drop policy does not cause men to commit (m)any less acts of domestic violence, but it does lead a significant number of women to report such DV when those women otherwise (1) wouldn’t have trusted themselves to follow through with the prosecution of their abusers, and (2) would have, in a signifiant number of cases, murder their abusers. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 8:08 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
(m) The custodial parent shall have an identical two-week period of uninterrupted time when school is not in session for purposes of vacation. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:06 am by Jack Bogdanski
They lost by 19.And so as much as I was hoping to be able to give Billups a grade of B so far, I'm afraid it's a B-minus at this point, and it may be a C-plus by Christmas.Maybe Lillard will come back healthy and turn things around, but it will probably take a while, clutching and scratching as the record slips below .500. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 3:53 am
The Landgericht München I (Regional Court, Munich I, Germany), before which the proceedings between Sony and Mr Mc Fadden were brought, takes the view that he was not the actual party who infringed the copyright, but is minded to reach a finding of indirect liability on the ground that his Wi-Fi network had not been made secure. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am by David Post
To the extent “intermediate scrutiny” has teeth — and I’m generally skeptical of this point — it comes in part (b): Has the government demonstrated that these disclosure provisions do not “burden substantially more speech than necessary” to advance that interest? [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
 Where the more usual sort of infringement is alleged (Directive, Article 5(1)(b), and section 10(2) of the 1994 Act), this broadly involves the use of the same or similar mark on the same or similar goods or services, causing a likelihood of confusion of the relevant consumers, where that use is “in the course of trade”. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:13 am
The Claimant failed to act expeditiously in moving Perindopril into category M (i.e. the 'generic' price category) of the NHS Drug Tariff. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 6:06 am by Paul Adam
I'm here today to tell you thatisn't totally accurate. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  9thCir.: functionality b/c of psychological and health benefits (claimed). [read post]