Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 3961 - 3980 of 5,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2024, 6:00 am by Administrator
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 [1] Abella J. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the Matter of EV (a child) (Scotland); In the Matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland), heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Those elements motivate core differences in the Court’s interpretive debates over fundamental privileges versus promises, textualism versus purposivism, status quo-preserving originalism vs. rights-promoting pragmatism.[4] I aim to explore those elements with an eye to the plurality of opinions that emerge from shared legal texts, now that stare decisis is in question as a way to settle them and now that interpretations of history and tradition matter a lot toward the same end. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 3:42 pm by familoo
Firstly, the Mostyn J judgment authorising the c-section. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
His antitrust opinions, certain other competition matters, and a closely related dispute over the Obama net neutrality rule betray an ideological, anti-regulatory activist, willing to take bits and pieces of precedent and use them to change the law as he likes. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
Similarly, referring to the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, Justice Peter McClellan and Christopher Beshara claim that ‘[i]n spite of the distasteful subject matter with which it sometimes deals, the court can occasionally be the source of humour’. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
In so ordering, Judge Kacsmaryk broke with long-standing precedent cautioning judicial deference to the political branches in matters implicating foreign affairs and seemed to subordinate the Executive’s interest in controlling such matters to States’ interests in immigration enforcement. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Directors as a matter of course should have robust information about the independence and aims of director nominees before recommending a vote for or against their candidacy.[5]  Once in possession of such information, directors “have a fiduciary duty to disclose to the shareholders the available material facts that would enable them to make an informed decision[.] [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In addition, the Court noted the significant differences between the constitutional and political contexts of the two countries, societal differences, the different position of the media and the degree to which the courts had left matters for judicial interpretation (at 399). [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
The Crown can then rebut this presumption for the purposes of the analysis under the curative proviso in s. 686(1)(b)(iv). [read post]