Search for: "MATTER OF D S N" Results 3961 - 3980 of 5,779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 6:20 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Although defense counsel failed to object to any of the alleged acts of misconduct and thus failed to preserve defendant's present contention for our review (see People v Paul, 78 AD3d 1684, 1684-1685, lv denied 16 NY3d 834), we are nevertheless compelled to exercise our power to address it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:24 pm
  And at the very least, you'd have to articulate the theory. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:52 am by Susan Brenner
It’s a matter of common sense and fairness. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 8:35 am
Ohio's new tax scheme recognizes how doing business has evolved, focusing on a taxpayer's participation in Ohio's economic market instead of the taxpayer's physical presence (i.e., property and employees) in the state, and thereby substantially reducing the tax burden on Ohio-based businesses whose customers are predominantly outside Ohio. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  Specifically, according to Paragraph 3 of the 2009 Practice Direction concerning the Estates List, the following matters are heard:  (a) All matters arising under Rules 74 and 75 of the Rules of Civil Procedure; (b) Applications under Rule 14.05 regarding estates, wills and trusts, including applications for advice under section 60 of the Trustee Act; (c) Applications relating to inter vivos trusts, whether under Rule 14.05, the Variation of Trusts Act,… [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
LV sent a C&D to the Black Eyed Peas and was unaware of the other uses until they were raised in a deposition. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:32 am by Rob Robinson
Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations An Expert’s Inadvertent Production Results in Waiver of Privilege Absent Sufficient Supervision by Counsel or Prompt Steps to Rectify Disclosure - bit.ly/KecxsL (K&L Gates) Can Employees Be Unretained Experts under Rule 26(b)(4)(D)? [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:00 am by Chris Whytock
Of course, a defendant should not be forced to bear the risk of a plaintiff’s misconduct in foreign judicial proceedings, and a plaintiff should not be allowed to profit from that misconduct. [read post]
27 May 2012, 2:07 pm by Madelaine Lane
  In reaching this conclusion, the Court recognized that the trial court’s duty in this matter does not fall under the explicit instructions found in MCR 6.302 (B)–(D). [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:21 am by Schachtman
  The suggestion that scraps of evidence from different kinds of scientific studies can establish scientific knowledge was rejected by the great mathematician, physicist, and philosopher of science, Henri Poincaré: “[O]n fait la science avec des faits comme une maison avec des pierres; mais une accumulation de faits n’est pas plus une science qu’un tas de pierres n’est une maison. [read post]
24 May 2012, 7:49 am by Bexis
RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS, §433, cmt. d (1965) (“Some other event which is a contributing factor in producing the harm may have such a predominant effect in bringing it about as to make the effect of the actor’s negligence insignificant and, therefore, to prevent it from being a substantial factor. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:46 pm by Schachtman
  If the “characteristic in common” is the basis for an interaction with the exposure to S, then we would expect that to be shown by the data in the study; it would not, and should not, be a matter of conjecture or speculation. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:07 pm by John Steele
Waldman, for the Plaintiff/Appellant                                       Joanna Cox, for the Defendant/Respondent   DATE HEARD:   November 25, 2011 at Toronto       A M E N D E D   E N D O R S E M E N T   MATLOW, J.; This appeal [1]    … [read post]