Search for: "Miller, in the Matter of" Results 3961 - 3980 of 5,116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2011, 8:13 am by Bridget Crawford
 Here’s my start at a list of feminist law profs who blog (or also blog) elsewhere: Horace Anderson, Hip Hop Law Rachel Anderson, Rachel Anderson’s Law Blog Laura Appleman, The Faculty Lounge Ann Bartow, Madisonian.net Linda Beale, A Taxing Matter Sara Benson, Sexual Orientation and the Law Blog Barbara Black, Securities Law Prof Caitlin Borgmann, Reproductive Rights Prof Rebecca Bratspies, IntLawGrrls Pamela Bridgewater, Hip Hop Law Erin Buzuvis, Title IX Blog… [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:04 pm by Matt C. Bailey
See 18 Wright & Miller § 4417, at 454 (stating that preclusion is "inappropriate" when "different legal standards . . . masquerad[e] behind similar legal labels"). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:15 am
Nassau appealed, contending that Supreme Court should have dismissed the action against it “as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:47 pm by Kenneth Anderson
The curious part is the suggestion that DOD activity does require host nation consent as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 5:55 pm by Kenneth Anderson
But in each piece the claim is that this is a matter of legal obligation, not just policy preference. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Another Cordis witness, Jeff Miller, testified that when he first heard about the idea of carrying the workpiece fixture directly on the cutting tool he thought it was a “fantastic” idea. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:20 pm by PaulKostro
State, 764 P.2d 674, 677 (Wyo. 1988) (stating that because res gestae hearsay exceptions had been codified in W.R.E. 803, res gestae should be eliminated); Miller v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:35 am by Gritsforbreakfast
That is a totally different, and for all practical intents and purposes, a settled matter. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
  This was in the case of Sienna Miller v News Group. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 9:10 pm
Thanks to Caros Miller for having linked to this Channel 10 story. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:23 am by Maxwell Kennerly
But the in-house lawyer went a step further, and offered a fascinating theory: an angry jury -- no matter the source of the injury -- is bad for the defense. [read post]