Search for: "Sides v. Beene" Results 3961 - 3980 of 25,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2011, 7:54 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
West Linn Corporate Park LLC v City of West Linn, No. 11-299 (petition for cert. filed Sep. 6, 2011), a petition we've been following that asked whether the nexus and "rough proportionality" tests for a regulatory taking in Nollan and Dolan are limited to government demands for land, has been denied. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:07 am
  The Scruggs side was argued by Tim Balducci, which will also be of interest to many. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 7:37 am by Bexis
 . warning would have been of any significance.Id. slip op. at 9-10 (quotations from Terhune v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 10:18 am
” That remark allegedly caused Pappas to snap and so he fatally shot the victim.In R. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:54 pm by Josh Sturtevant
Blawgconomics is often critical of 'News Entertainment,' the ceaseless ranting of talk radio show hosts and a political discourse which has been boiled down to the most base form of Us v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 7:27 am by Larry Catá Backer
They remind us that the promise of Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:22 pm by skelly
Since the Bellefonte decision (Bellefonte Reinsurance Co. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Henry P Yang
Moreover, validity should also have been taken into account, because a qualitative approach to the stack and to portions within the stack only makes sense if both essentiality and validity are factored in ([123], i). [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 1:21 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
While some argue that waiting time penalties can accrue solely for a failure to make premium payments for missed meal or rest breaks, the California Supreme Court, in Kirby v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
  In Meadows v Khan and Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton, the Supreme Court set out a six-part test for determining a damages claim for the tort of negligence. [read post]