Search for: "State v. Back" Results 3961 - 3980 of 42,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2016, 9:54 am by Ronald Mann
The justices will be taking a trip back to Federal Courts class when they hear arguments next week in Lightfoot v Cendant Mortgage Corp. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am by Thomas Kaufman
  The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by A. Brian Albritton
District Court in Arizona recently sanctioned the attorneys for the relator in the qui tam case of United States ex rel Jerre Frazier v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
She sought back pay, front pay, benefits, compensatory damages, reasonable attorneys' fees, and an injunction restraining the State from continuing its discriminatory practices. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm by JURIST Staff
The vote follows a ruling by Arizona’s Supreme Court that the 159-year-old law banning abortion was enforceable in the aftermath of the US Supreme Court’s 2022 decision to overturn abortion rights case Roe v Wade, sending a 52-year-old case back to trial court. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:00 am by Guest Author
One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 11:45 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
At the same time, the Appellate Division usually defers to the judgments of the SDHR when that agency does find discrimination.The case is In the Matter of State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
Several criminal and related cases are on the docket.NY State Rifle & Pistol v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  At 10 a.m., the Court will hear a state case, Riley v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]