Search for: "United States v. AT&T, Inc." Results 3961 - 3980 of 8,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
  First up is Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
United States that "use" requires "active employment" of the firearm against 1993's SOC holding in Smith v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-10443, and Lopez v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
§337(a), which states:“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter [the entire FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:21 pm by Eric Turkewitz
This is the heart and soul of the decision: That premise is inconsistent with the reasoning underlying the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Lawrence v Texas (539 US 558 [2003]), in which the Court held that laws criminalizing homosexual conduct violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution (id. at 578). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 8:42 am by Theresa Gabaldon
Gorsuch’s questioning of Christopher Michel, assistant to the solicitor general, arguing for the United States as an amicus in support of Somers, led Michel to concede that if the procedural-defects argument had been properly raised at an earlier point, and procedural defects had been established, “you wouldn’t be able to defer to that. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm by Beth Hutchens
Shortly thereafter, it filed a trademark application for “APP STORE” in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Guest Opinion
  Breakfast food, cookies and crackers are also in demand, according to Mondelez International Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am by Eric Goldman
MySpace, Inc., 528 F.3d 413, 418 (5th Cir. 2008); see also Doe v. [read post]