Search for: "**deforest v. U.s" Results 21 - 37 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm by John Elwood
Ltd., 16-1220 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:59 pm by David Doniger
These emission limits are consistent with recommendations of the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am by Richard Goldfarb
  Indeed, a patent to refine potash into pearl ash, which is basically pure potassium carbonate, was patent no. 1 (now X1) issued by the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
Filling in or polluting wetlands stunts their ability to store and filter floodwater, control erosion, improve water quality by trapping sediments, serve as a nursery to replenish fish stock, and provide a unique habitat for plants, wildlife, and fish.[2] Furthermore, wetlands are necessary for the continued existence of endangered species such as the American Black Duck.[3] Prior to European colonization, the continental United States had over 221 million acres of wetlands.[4] However, rapid… [read post]
When a firm seeks to use ESG principles in its business operations and/or investing decisions, it may do so by providing public disclosures, statements, or claims related to the following types of criteria: Environmental: Information related to, inter alia, energy efficiencies, water usage, water and ground pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, impact on biodiversity and deforestation, use of recycled or renewable materials, or a product’s cradle-to-grave lifecycle. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 8:06 am
Even better, the PDCA might help Cuba avoid the effects of the U.S: embargo--especially those aspects targeting the economic drivers of the Cuban economy that have been targeted by the latest round of U.S. [read post]