Search for: "-PJK Richards v. Warren"
Results 21 - 40
of 403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
Of Insurrections, Presidents, and the Utter Failure of Constitutional Law to Address the Real Issues
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Dedicated to Retired Judge Dick Posner Two of America's most prominent conservative constitutional law professors, both self-described originalists, Will Baude and Michael Paulsen, have penned a 126-page opus explaining why Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualifies on its own terms with no enabling legislation Donald Trump and likely many others from holding office under the United States or any state. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:06 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 1:01 am
He also represented Clarence Earl Gideon in what became a landmark Supreme Court case, decision Gideon v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
Warren Nutter with introducing him to the subject. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
As you can guess from the title, Berger's book was very critical of the Warren Court (and its aftermath in the 70s). [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
(Image: Warren K. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
(Image: Warren K. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
The success of Google’s appeal in Lloyd v Google and the decision in Warren v DSG Retail (see our post here) seems to have halted 2021’s flow of data breach claims. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:13 am
The evidence submitted in support of their motion failed to eliminate triable issues of fact as to whether the parties had agreed upon a flat fee arrangement as contended by Golub and the Golub companies (see 2978 Gas Corp. v United Fleet, Inc., 197 AD3d 1138, 1139 [2021]; see generally Cobble Hill Nursing Home v Henry & Warren Corp., 74 NY2d 475, 482 [1989]). [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
And plenty of progressives thought Warren too moderate. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:03 am
Richard Blumenthal previously warned the Supreme Court that, if it continued to issue conservative rulings or “chip away at Roe v Wade,” it would trigger “a seismic movement to reform the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Brennan or Earl Warren, but, rather, John Marshall Harlan, who on notable occasions, including the reapportionment cases, dissented from quintessential “Warren Court” decisions. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
First, as always, I want to convey my deepest thanks to the organizers of this splendid (at least from my perspective) project, Richard Albert and Ashley Moran—and to the indispensable Trish Do, who actually makes the Zoom project work without any foul ups. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
That is a special reason to be grateful to Richard, who is truly a bridge both between countries and continents, but also between generations. [read post]
