Search for: "A Royal Touch, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2017, 11:52 am
Those contradictions might be understood as touching on the political, social, and economic contexts in which regulatory systems are increasingly embedded. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:02 am
Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., representing the first ATS case to be decided post-RJR Nabisco. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:46 am
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
Princess Di was so famous for nothing–which is, after all, what the “royals” “do”–that even when she later on kind of did some things, those things couldn’t touch her fame for nothingness. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 8:15 am
Stein has voiced her objections to waivers on at least two other occasions regarding Deutsche Bank AG and for multiple waivers granted to UBS AG, Barclays Plc, Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and the Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Part II briefly touches on the political background for the judicial regulatory measures discussed, with particular attention to a series of governmental inquiries beginning in the 1970s that served to sharpen public scrutiny of the legal profession. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S.Ct. 1659 (2013) [10] Suhail Najim Abdullah Al Shimari; Taha Yaseen Arraq Rashid; Salah Hasan Nusaif Al-Ejaili; Asa’ad Hamza Hanfoosh Al Zuba’e v CACI Premier Technology, Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:33 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. barred this claim because it was an extraterritorial application of federal law against them. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
We have considered how it grew as a complex interplay between the institution of the royal courts, the chancery, and customary norms transformed into a basis for a legal system applied by the courts. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/dJTlKZFi3o -> CASL " It is a sledgehammer to kill a fly approach to spam" http://t.co/dJTlKZFi3o -> CASL "the significant amount of time, effort, and money… will come nowhere close to justifying any meagre benefit" http://t.co/dJTlKZFi3o -> Sandra Aistars, Regarding the Supreme Court Decision in American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
As my colleague Perell J. put it in High Parklane Consulting Inc. v Royal Group Technologies Ltd., [2007] OJ No 107 (SCJ), at para 36, “[i]t is trite to say that making a living is a stressful activity and that much of life can be nasty and brutish. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Royal Soc’y Med. 295, 295 (1965). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:57 am
___________The third touches on the Ethics Council's defense of its own work and place within the governance structures of the Norwegian SWF. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 10:19 pm
That early blog post noted Diageo’s federally-registered purple bag non-traditional trademark, and that a third party had slipped in at the USPTO to federally register a velvet touch mark for wine: Although Diageo appears to have made no attempt yet to federally register or protect the velvet touch or feel of the Crown Royal pouch bag, American Wholesale Wine & Spirits, Inc., obtained a federal trademark registration toward the end of 2006 for a… [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:41 am
Princess Di was so famous for nothing–which is, after all, what the “royals” “do”–that even when she later on kind of did some things, those things couldn’t touch her fame for nothingness. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia: In the case of Google Inc v ACCC ([2013] HCA 1) the High Court of Australia held that Google was not liable for engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct as a result of the production of sponsored links. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 11:41 pm
’s Zoll unit has filed a suit against Royal Philips Electronics’ Respironics Inc. before the US District Court of Delaware, alleging infringement of a U.S. patent with equipment used to monitor patients being treated for sleep-disordered breathing. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 6:13 pm
Princess Di was so famous for nothing–which is, after all, what the “royals” “do”–that even when she later on kind of did some things, those things couldn’t touch her fame for nothingness. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:44 am
In the past week, for instance, an 8-K filed by KBR, Inc. [read post]
