Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 21 - 40
of 11,548
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2022, 7:54 am
Continue Reading › [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:47 pm
If you read my previous post on IRS examinations, you know that an audit or examination begins with a letter from the IRS. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:18 pm
A representative independent claim on appeal read: 1. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
The post El Paso Appeals Court Refuses to Compel Arbitration Where Employee Cannot Read English appeared first on Disputing. [read post]
3 May 2017, 3:14 am
Court of Appeals. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:57 pm
To continue reading, click: Sound Trademark for Click of Eyeglasses Granted on Appeal [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 12:14 pm
For details, read “What is Probable Cause For Police to Arrest in Texas? [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the focus must be on the claimed invention; the examiner cannot focus on substitutions between the claims and the prior art. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:45 pm
For example, in Ex parte Jenkins, Appeal No. 2020-002816 (PTAB Aug. 12, 2020), the examiner specifi [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:26 am
Continue reading [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:26 am
Continue reading [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 5:35 am
A Massachusetts appeal court refused to uphold an insurer’s fire claim rejection that was based on an alleged failure of the insured to submit to a “reasonably required” examination under oath in the course of investigating the claim because, on the facts, the insured had not wilfully and without excuse refused to present its president and owner for an examination under oath. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 8:12 am
Similarly, on page 103, Nitta teaches a separate power source SP for delivery of power to the wire feeder.For these reasons, we do not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claim 12 and claims 13-17 which depend therefrom.As a footnote to the case, note the point about provisional double-patenting rejections: Claim 1 of copending Application No. 11/609,871 was amended on July 2, 2010, after the Examiner’s rejection that is the subject of this appeal (see Office… [read post]
22 May 2010, 6:55 am
Krueger et al. case is critical reading for those who need to examine title to property in Minnesota or determine the priority of secured creditors. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 7:27 am
During an Examiner Interview, the Supervisory Examiner indicated that none of claims 1-11 read on Fig. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:49 pm
Footnote 5 of Ex parte Kissel is of interest: The Examiner stated in the Answer that “[e]very ground of rejection set forth in the Office action from which the appeal is taken (as modified by any advisory actions) is being maintained by the examiner except for the grounds of rejection (if any) listed under the subheading ‘WITHDRAWN REJECTIONS’” (Ans. 3). [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 6:49 am
Mistakes are made during the applicant examinations that is why there is an appeal process. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:20 am
Arnie Clarke and Harriet CrawfordLate in 2018, Board 3.5.07 issued two decisions on appeals from Examining Division decisions, in which the length of the examination procedure was excessive. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 4:52 pm
If you were disqualified as a candidate for a law enforcement or other civil service position for psychological reasons, the first thing you should do is hire an experienced and qualified disqualification appeal lawyer, who thoroughly understands the appeal process and will examine your particular case to determine whether or not you have grounds for a psychological disqualification appeal. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 5:13 pm
If you were disqualified as a candidate for a law enforcement or other civil service position for psychological reasons, the first thing you should do is hire an experienced and qualified disqualification appeal lawyer, who thoroughly understands the appeal process and will examine your particular case to determine whether or not you have grounds for a psychological disqualification appeal. [read post]
