Search for: "A.B.1"
Results 21 - 40
of 340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 3:11 pm
On January 1 of this year, it became legal under state law for California adults to purchase cannabis products for recreational use. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Dick Co. as a major turning point in American patent and antitrust law. 224 U.S. 1 (1912). [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:27 pm
He wanted her to be able to do so after his death.A.B. died without a will, and K.L.W. sought to have his sperm released so that she could conceive his child.Unfortunately, no one advised the couple of the requirement in s. 8(1) of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act, S.C. 204, c. 2 (“AHRA”) and ss. 3(1) and 4(1) of the Assisted Human Reproduction (Section 8 Consent) Regulations, SOR/2007-137 (the “Regulations”) that A.B. consent in writing… [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:29 am
A.B. 8880 articulates three goals for this campaign:(1) To promote public awareness of hospice and palliative care services; and palliative care options for patients with a terminal illness or condition(2) To inform the public of the importance of advance care planning and the individual's right to direct and participate in health care decisions affecting the individual(3) To educate individuals on the tools available to ensure their health… [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
If enacted, A.B. 2829 would impose a 5% tax on annual gross revenues derived from digital advertising services in California. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
If enacted, A.B. 2829 would impose a 5% tax on annual gross revenues derived from digital advertising services in California. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
If enacted, A.B. 2829 would impose a 5% tax on annual gross revenues derived from digital advertising services in California. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
If enacted, A.B. 2829 would impose a 5% tax on annual gross revenues derived from digital advertising services in California. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
If enacted, A.B. 2829 would impose a 5% tax on annual gross revenues derived from digital advertising services in California. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
If enacted, A.B. 2829 would impose a 5% tax on annual gross revenues derived from digital advertising services in California. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 2:00 am
Late last month, the New Jersey Legislature passed A.B. 4233. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
The indictments stemmed from the thirty-seven-year-old Ross's relationship with a twelve-year-old boy, A.B.[ 1 ] The State alleged that on July 4, 2007, Ross committed sexual battery by having sexual intercourse with A.B. and that she had touched his penis for the purpose of gratifying her lust. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:52 pm
.; Ferring A.B.; Frederick Paulsen, Jr; DOES 1 through 10 Correction of inventorship of U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:27 pm
Because A.B. 1215 will end on January 1, 2023, we are encouraging communities across the state to advocate for face recognition bans in your own cities and towns. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:41 pm
John Love of the USPTO will speak at the Knowledge Congress' teleconference entitled: "Clarifying KSR and Its Impact on Patent Law," scheduled for November 20, 2007, Tuesday, at 1:00 PM - 3:30 PM EST.Details: http://knowledgecongress.org/2007.ksr.htmKenneth Bass III (JD, Yale; A.B., Chemistry, Duke; co-counsel for Teleflex in KSR v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 2:54 pm
A.B. 1710 will become effective on January 1, 2015. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:24 pm
After a full day of testimony and deliberation on December 16, 2010, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) adopted the state’s Cap-and-Trade Program on a 9-to-1 vote. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
A.B. 1274 - Privacy of Customer Electrical or Natural Gas Usage Data (effective Jan. 1, 2014). [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:51 pm
Companies including Comcast, AT&T, and Verizon, which have spent close to $1 million lobbying on it in 2019. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:38 pm
The California Legislature has enacted new Public Resources Code § 21159.25, effective as of January 1, 2019 (Stats. 2018, c. 670 (A.B. 1804)), which extends much of the substance of the existing CEQA Guidelines’ Class 32 categorical exemption for “infill development” (14 Cal. [read post]
