Search for: "ABM, INC."
Results 21 - 40
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2015, 11:11 am
ABM Security Services, Inc., which reversed a near-$90 million judgment awarded in the favor of a certified class of current and former security guards on rest period claims, and also held that while “an on-call guard must return to duty if called to do so, [] remaining available to work is not the same as actually working. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
In Apple Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
ABM Security Services, Inc., reversing a near-$90 million judgment awarded in the favor of a certified class of current and former security guards on rest period claims. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:06 am
ABM Security Services, Inc., reversing a near-$90 million judgment awarded in the favor of a certified class of current and former security guards on rest period claims. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:41 pm
ABM Security Services, Inc., the California Supreme Court issued a ruling on employer’s obligations to permit employees to take “off-duty” rest periods. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 1:48 pm
Background Of The Case The plaintiffs worked as security guards for ABM Security Services, Inc. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 4:47 pm
ABM Security Services, Inc. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:17 pm
Materials Inc. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:44 pm
American Building Materials, Inc., No. 8:10-CV-313-T-24-AEP (M.D. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:18 pm
ABM Industries, Inc. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 1:11 am
In the case of Augustus v ABM Security Servs., Inc. (2016) 2 C5th 257, the court held that the plaintiffs, security guards, need to be completely relieved of work obligations during their rest breaks. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 9:59 am
ABM Security Services, Inc. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
ABM Security Services, Inc., the California Supreme Court determined that employers are prohibited from implementing “on-call” rest breaks. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:02 am
ABM Security Services, Inc., after an appellate court found that “simply being on call” did not constitute performing work. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:13 am
While the parent company, in this case ABM, did have control over the operations of the subsidiary company SSA, Inc., for example: (1) ABM owned 100% of the voting securities in SSA, Inc., (2) SSA, Inc. does not hold annual board meetings, keep corporate minutes, or conduct its own audits, and (3) all but one of SSA, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
On December 31, 2014, in a closely-watched case implicating substantive wage-and-hour law as well as class action law, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, reversed orders granting summary judgment and summary adjudication in favor of a plaintiff class of security guards for rest break violations under the California Labor Code, and affirmed the [...] [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 11:55 am
ABM Industries Inc., 265 F.Supp.2d 302 (S.D.N.Y. 2003), a janitorial company that held a contract to clean the World Trade Center (“WTC”) submitted a claim to its carrier as a result of the September 11th attacks. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
Relying on the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
He is also the principal physician of Emergency Medicine Litigation Analysts, Inc., where Dr. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:41 pm
The Plaintiffs were successful in showing ABM's control over the operations of SSA, Inc. considering the following: (1) ABM owned 100% of the voting securities in SSA, Inc., (2) SSA, Inc. does not hold annual board meetings, keep corporate minutes, or conduct its own audits, and (3) all but one of SSA, Inc.'s officers are ABM's officers. [read post]
