Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,576
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2009, 10:18 am
First, in December, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an order staying the rule. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Janus v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Third, the rules will prohibit an adviser from charging to the fund fees and expenses related to investigations that result in a court or government authority sanctioning the adviser for violating the Advisers Act. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
Third, the rules will prohibit an adviser from charging to the fund fees and expenses related to investigations that result in a court or government authority sanctioning the adviser for violating the Advisers Act. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 1:12 pm
An employee who has exhausted these administrative remedies would be permitted to file a claim in federal district court. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:19 pm
While there are liability rules in the Constitution that apply to individuals (for example, the Takings Clause), I am interested in structural liability rules that are used to support fundamental values or manage a substantial legal transition.The Spending Clause is the best contemporary example. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 6:03 am
The Act would better amending 203(b)(3) to exclude the new term “private fund” from the 15 client rule exemption. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
It has been argued that the PGE distinction between billing inserts and shareholder proposals would not apply to this rule because it affects the speech of shareholders such as hedge funds and not just corporate officials. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:31 pm
The central part of this act eliminates the Section 203(b)(3) exemption for registration for hedge fund managers (see Section 403). [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:44 pm
While the previous bill amended the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, this bill amends the Investment Company Act of 1940 (”ICA”). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
In late January, the Federal Courts Rules were amended to permit the maintenance of court files in electronic form. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Mar. 21, 2012), the district court dismissed the plaintiff’s derivative action with leave to amend. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:17 am
In addition to changing the rules for calculating interest rates for purposes of determining defined benefit plan minimum funding obligations, MAP-21 also extends rules allowing transfers of excess pension assets to retiree health accounts to December 31, 2021 and expands those transfer rules also to allow transfers to fund retiree group term life insurance accounts. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:49 am
Those changes have since resulted in a wave of marketing hype from technology vendors, but only dim awareness among data managers about how the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures (FRCP) affect them. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 3:03 am
IHI had earlier filed a motion to dismiss an August 2016 amended complaint by PBGC but the court denied it on May 15, 2017. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 3:03 am
IHI had earlier filed a motion to dismiss an August 2016 amended complaint by PBGC but the court denied it on May 15, 2017. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:13 pm
Today’s ruling by the Supreme Court in Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987), the Supreme Court used a five-part rule to uphold the constitutionality of a federal statute that threatened to withhold a percentage of federal highway funds from states that set a lower drinking age. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:28 pm
In a win for self-funded (i.e., self-insured) health plans subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), the Tenth Circuit recently ruled that ERISA preempts provisions of an Oklahoma law regulating pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and pharmacy networks. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:45 am
The Court stressed that the addition of Section 8(c) of the National Labor Relations Act by the 1947 Taft-Hartley Act was intended to protect non-coercive, non-threatening speech for all parties in the context of union organizing: From one vantage, §8(c) merely implements the First Amendment... in that it responded to particular constitutional rulings of the NLRB...But its enactment also manifested a “congressional intent to encourage free debate on issues… [read post]
