Search for: "AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC." Results 21 - 40 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm
  This means that each co-defendant in a tort case is liable for no more than his respective percentage of fault. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 935 A.2d 787, 795 (N.J. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and upholding the maximum amount a rational jury could award on the record so viewed (measured by the relevant legal guideposts), based on Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:00 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
American Honda Motor Co., the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s finding that three Calcar patents are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
Virginia viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and upholding the maximum amount a rational jury could award on the record so viewed (measured by the relevant legal guideposts), based on Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), which PLAC not only briefed, but helped organize (defense counsel was simultaneously on PLAC’s case selection committee). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 666 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2012), contained a throwaway line “[N]o class may be certified that contains members lacking Article III standing,” citing a Second Circuit case but then immediately citing Stearns and not explaining the contradiction, and then setting a low bar for standing: as the court here summarized, “[s]imply spending money on something that doesn’t do what it claims to do is all the… [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 900 F.Supp. 1287, 1296 (C.D. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 3:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 666 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2012), which, the court held, didn’t establish a bright-line rule rejecting all nationwide classes under California consumer protection statutes. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Honda Motor Co., Inc., 666 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2012). [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 2:54 pm by Ken
He has litigated cases against Intel Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., Honda North America, Inc., Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc., BMW of North America, LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Keyes European, LLC, Rusnak Enterprises, LLC and Wells Fargo Auto Finance, Inc. [read post]