Search for: "Albert D. Thomas"
Results 21 - 40
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am
The Justice Department’s current investigation of criminal efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election apparently is taking two paths. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:46 am
Cal. 2021). [7] Id. at 1038. [8] See, e.g., Albert B. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 1:29 am
The Law Commission has published its final report (pdf) on reforming the criminal law as it relates to intimate image abuse. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Again, the first thing to do is to thank the participants in this gathering and the team of colleagues at UT without whom none of this would be possible, Ashley Moran, Richard Albert, and Trish Do. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
William D. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
SEC Rules Would Make SPAC Process More Burdensome than Traditional IPOs Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Brian Hecht, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Friday, April 22, 2022 Tags: IPOs, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, SPACs, Special purpose vehicles Liability for Non-Disclosure in Equity Financing Posted by Albert H. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:27 am
SEC Rules Would Make SPAC Process More Burdensome than Traditional IPOs Posted by Gail Weinstein, Philip Richter, and Brian Hecht, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Friday, April 22, 2022 Tags: IPOs, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, SPACs, Special purpose vehicles Liability for Non-Disclosure in Equity Financing Posted by Albert H. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:38 am
In re Moonlite Bar-B-Q Inn, Inc., Serial No. 86636794 (March 9, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
This makes Congress complicit in the consequences, whether intended or not (see Kendra Albert, Enough About FOSTA’s ‘Unintended Consequences’; They Were Always Intended). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:04 am
One Albert Droste, an insurance broker living in the neighborhood, filed a lawsuit seeking to enjoin the sale. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
THE ESSENTIAL MEDICINES DEBATE PRIOR TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC The TRIPS Agreement has been the subject of intense criticism by some who allege that TRIPS subjects developing countries to the prices charged by pharmaceutical companies for essential medicines, practically denying the most vulnerable citizens of these countries access to potentially lifesaving drugs and preventing access to much cheaper generics… [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
(The opening paragraph of Justice Thomas’s dissent, previewing the disrespect and legal carelessness the rest of his opinion displays towards the state courts more generally, observes that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did what it did because it was “[d]issatisfied” with the legislature’s deadline; it is only later in the dissent that Thomas informs readers that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said it was required to take action because the state… [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 9:35 am
Farha Thomas K. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
“Behind the constitutional arguments [in both Congresses] loomed the political fact that the Secretary of State was Thomas Jefferson,” David Currie has noted. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:15 am
Trivia: The novel upon which the film is based was written by John D. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
In an apparent attempt to reverse the rogue decision, the majority of active judges on the Ninth Circuit authorized en banc review.[3] But because the Ninth Circuit has so many judges, it alone among the federal appellate courts employs a limited en banc review, where only eleven of its active judges sit en banc, consisting of the chief judge and ten other active judges who are randomly selected.[4] Accordingly, limited en banc allows for “minority rule” in a subset of cases,[5]… [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
In evaluating and certifying the attached claim (which was owned at the time by Albert J. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 2:14 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of M&P SHIELD for knives, can openers, hatchets, and machetes, in view of the registered mark SHIELD for "knives"].In re EP Family, Corp., Serial Nos. 87561113 and 87561116 (September 4, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:16 pm
"); see also Clark D. [read post]
