Search for: "Ali v Ali"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,939
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm
Ali v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire [2023] EWHC 938 (KB). [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:05 am
Ali United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:46 am
En effet, selon le Tribunal, l’Employeur n’a pas l’obligation de mettre à l’épreuve son personnel afin de vérifier la capacité à effectuer une tâche. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Or, selon un sondage réalisé par la Commission d’accès à l’information (CAI), 91 % des personnes préfèrent faire affaire avec une organisation qui protège adéquatement les renseignements personnels qu’elle détient[1]. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
There was also a hearing in the case of Price v Newsquest Media Group. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
” Washington Post (Opinion, Editorial Board) Equity and Justice Related Articles & Resources: A law that helped end slavery is now a weapon to end affirmative action (Julian Mark, Washington Post) California Tried to Warn Us (Shirin Ali, Slate) LGBTQ candidates scorecard 2023 Election night (Lisa Keen, Out Smart) Climate Change Articles & Resources: Earth just had its hottest year on record — climate change is to blame (Carissa Wong, Nature) Talk like a… [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:17 am
Read the opinion The post JAAMI ALI V. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
IPSO 18363-23 Ali v Telegraph & Argus, 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 20131-23 Rothon v lancasterguardian.co.uk, 3 Harassment (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Resolution Statement – 20132-23 Rothon v lancashiretelegraph.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation… [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 11:00 pm
”)As for the case not being dismissed on an “inconvenient forum” – or “forum non conveniens” grounds – the AD1 noted that while the current principal of the companies lived in Uzbekistan, since Ali was the main witness, it didn’t think the application needed to be entertained, particularly since the new owner could “appear by electronic means,” if his testimony was found to be necessary.Bet that didn’t massage their egos… [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:34 am
Blancas Hermosillo v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
., for the CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons,” 384 New Engl. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 12:53 pm
The Court of Appeal reviewed the main authorities R v Hillingdon London Borough Council ex p Puhlhofer (1986) AC 484 (‘Puhlhofer‘), which concerned the interpretation of sections 1 and 4 of the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977 (‘the 1977 Act’), R v Brent London Borough Council ex p Awua (1996) AC 55 (‘Awua‘), which concerned Part III of the 1985 Act, and Birmingham City Council v Ali [2009] UKHL 36; (2009) 1 WLR 1506… [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am
CanadaWard v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:17 am
MullenixPart V: Restatements and Legal TheoryChapter 18: Restatements and Realists, Robert W. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
In summary, the court ruled that the exclusion of Lanham Act liability, established by the Second Circuit precedent (Rogers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
In Jack Daniels v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
Most recently, the OTP brought gender persecution charges in a case against Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman. [read post]
