Search for: "Allen v. Gardner" Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 4:23 am by Wessen Jazrawi
The Government of the United States of America v  Richard O’Dwyer. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 9:17 am by Charon QC
David Allen Green, Carl Gardner and our guest, former Lib-Dem MP Dr Evan Harris, considered the vexed issue of privacy law and the balancing of interests in our latest Without Prejudice podcast. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
Whilst many considered this a victory in a way, some like Carl Gardner of Head of Legal felt a certain uneasiness about it. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am by Melina Padron
Carl Gardner from the Head of Legal blog voiced his indignation at the coverage and the debate over the superinjunctions issue. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm by Marie Louise
Allen v Bloomsbury Publishing Plc & Anor (1709 Blog) (IP Whiteboard) The chips are down in spud-separator shoot-off – EWCA judgment in Grimme Landmaschinenfabrik GmbH & Co KG v Derek Scott (trading as Scotts Potato Machinery) (IPKat) (EPLAW) Tate & Lyle v Roquette Frères: meticulous verbal analysis? [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 11:53 pm by INFORRM
At the New Statesman, David Allen Green examines psychic Sally Morgan’s reported legal complaint against Associated Newspapers. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:27 am by Charon QC
  Carl Gardner, author of The Head of Legal blog, has covered the case in detail. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:43 am by Charon QC
  On Wednesday evening last week, David Allen Green and Carl Gardner came over to The Staterooms for our fortnightly Without Prejudice series of podcasts. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Carl Gardner has an excellent post on the case here. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:22 pm by Charon QC
And let’s go for a hat trick of good reads (not that the blog posts which I refer to below are not good reads… they are… but Carl Gardner, on his Head of Legal blog, writes: Supreme Court judgment: Sugar v BBC “The Supreme Court has today given judgment in this case, about the extent to which the Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to information the BBC holds for journalistic purposes…. [read post]