Search for: "Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration" Results 21 - 40 of 570
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
This may lead to more rapid judicial clarification of the rules, to a great deal of expense and chaos, or all of the above. 3. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
That changed last year, after the Florida Legislature substantially amended the district's governing structure. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm by Daphne Keller
Florida: In Florida, the platforms prevailed in the district court on both Section 230 and First Amendment grounds. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Dean Falvy
Anderson, the Court has agreed to hear an appeal from the Colorado Supreme Court’s bombshell December 19, 2023 ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
However, the judge should not consider potential practical impacts from other judges’ anticipated disqualification unless applicable law, rules, or administrative orders permit the judge to do so. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 7:30 pm by David Oscar Markus
As Mark Joseph Stern wrote in Slate, this ruling won’t help Judge Newsom’s chances for being appointed to the Supreme Court in a Republican administration—but it shows that he’s a principled and independent jurist. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But judicial ethics at the state level receive scant attention. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Kirby added that the rules of engagement are less important than “the way they’re enforced. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
In the two cases, the platforms argue any regulation of their content moderation violates the First Amendment, while Florida and Texas assert their “must-carry provisions” – those directly affecting social media platforms’ content moderation decisions – are constitutional. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
By the time the commission rules on whether the law was violated, the group’s work will be done. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
The plaintiff opposed the entry of the proposed DRO and moved, inter alia for issuance of an amended DRO providing for retroactive distribution of the plaintiff’s share of the defendant’s pension benefits. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:04 am by INFORRM
An award-winning civil society initiative, EngelliWeb has been documenting Internet censorship and related judicial and administrative decisions in Türkiye since 2008. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Third, a district court, following vertical stare decisis, would rule that Florida is violating the First Amendment. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Judicial Conference to wrap up proposed rulemaking that would serve as a major check on such activity. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Although the Court long ago recognized that defamation claims need First Amendment safeguards because the state, through the judiciary, is making rules for speech, it is now unwilling to recognize the need for similar limits on other causes of action. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is the favored launchpad for right-leaning politicians and organizations seeking groundbreaking judicial decisions restricting abortion, limiting gun laws, and thwarting the ambitions of the Biden administration. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Bowman was charged in a judicial summons, meaning he was not arrested. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Federal Appeals Court Expands Limits on Biden Administration in First Amendment Case MSN – Jessica Guynn and John Fritze (USA Today) | Published: 10/3/2023 The nation’s top cybersecurity defense agency likely violated the First Amendment when lobbying Silicon Valley companies to remove or suppress the spread of online content about elections, a federal appeals court ruled. [read post]